» Articles » PMID: 33514047

The Real Time Geometric Effect of a Lordotic Curve-Controlled Spinal Traction Device: A Randomized Cross Over Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Jan 30
PMID 33514047
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A standard spinal traction (ST) device was designed to straighten the spine without considering physiological lumbar lordosis. Using lordotic curve-controlled traction (LCCT), which maintains the lordotic curve during traction, the traction force would be applied to the posterior spinal structure effectively. Thus, the purpose of our study was to evaluate real-time biomechanical changes while applying the LCCT and ST. In this study, 40 subjects with mild non-radicular low back pain (LBP) were included. The participants underwent LCCT and ST in random order. Anterior and posterior intervertebral distance, ratios of anterior/posterior intervertebral distance (A/P ratio), and lordotic angles of intervertebral bodies (L2~L5) were measured by radiography. Mean intervertebral distances were greater during LCCT than those measured prior to applying traction ( < 0.05). Mean A/P ratio was also significantly greater during LCCT than during ST or initially ( < 0.05). In particular, for the L4/5 intervertebral segment, which is responsible for most of the lordotic curve, mean LCCT angle was similar to mean lordotic angle in the standing position (10.9°). Based on measurements of radiologic geometrical changes with real-time clinical setting, the newly developed LCCT appears to be a useful traction device for increasing intervertebral disc spaces by maintaining lordotic curves.

Citing Articles

Non-Surgical Approaches to the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated with Radiculopathy: A Narrative Review.

El Melhat A, Youssef A, Zebdawi M, Hafez M, Khalil L, Harrison D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398287 PMC: 10888666. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040974.


Computational modeling of posteroanterior lumbar traction by an automated massage bed: predicting intervertebral disc stresses and deformation.

Cardoso L, Khadka N, Dmochowski J, Meneses E, Lee K, Kim S Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:931274.

PMID: 36189059 PMC: 9397988. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.931274.


Mechanical Changes of the Lumbar Intervertebral Space and Lordotic Angle Caused by Posterior-to-Anterior Traction Using a Spinal Thermal Massage Device in Healthy People.

Yoon Y, Lee J, Lee M, Kim K, Jang H, Lee K Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(7).

PMID: 34356278 PMC: 8307674. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070900.

References
1.
Gay R, Brault J . Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with traction therapy. Spine J. 2008; 8(1):234-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.025. View

2.
Ozturk B, Gunduz O, Ozoran K, Bostanoglu S . Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation. Rheumatol Int. 2005; 26(7):622-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-005-0035-x. View

3.
Clarke J, van Tulder M, Blomberg S, de Vet H, van der Heijden G, Bronfort G . Traction for low back pain with or without sciatica: an updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(14):1591-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222043.09835.72. View

4.
Beattie P, Nelson R, Michener L, Cammarata J, Donley J . Outcomes after a prone lumbar traction protocol for patients with activity-limiting low back pain: a prospective case series study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(2):269-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.778. View

5.
Oakley P, Harrison D, Harrison D, Haas J . Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2007; 49(4):270-96. PMC: 1840024. View