» Articles » PMID: 33511093

Abnormal Nutritive Sucking As an Indicator of Neonatal Brain Injury

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2021 Jan 29
PMID 33511093
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A term neonate is born with the ability to suck; this neuronal network is already formed and functional by 28 weeks gestational age and continues to evolve into adulthood. Because of the necessity of acquiring nutrition, the complexity of the neuronal network needed to suck, and neuroplasticity in infancy, the skill of sucking has the unique ability to give insight into areas of the brain that may be damaged either during or before birth. Interpretation of the behaviors during sucking shows promise in guiding therapies and how to potentially repair the damage early in life, when neuroplasticity is high. Sucking requires coordinated suck-swallow-breathe actions and is classified into two basic types, nutritive and non-nutritive. Each type of suck has particular characteristics that can be measured and used to learn about the infant's neuronal circuitry. Basic sucking and swallowing are present in embryos and further develop to incorporate breathing . Due to the rhythmic nature of the suck-swallow-breathe process, these motor functions are controlled by central pattern generators. The coordination of swallowing, breathing, and sucking is an enormously complex sensorimotor process. Because of this complexity, brain injury before birth can have an effect on these sucking patterns. Clinical assessments allow evaluators to score the oral-motor pattern, however, they remain ultimately subjective. Thus, clinicians are in need of objective measures to identify the specific area of deficit in the sucking pattern of each infant to tailor therapies to their specific needs. Therapeutic approaches involve pacifiers, cheek/chin support, tactile, oral kinesthetic, auditory, vestibular, and/or visual sensorimotor inputs. These therapies are performed to train the infant to suck appropriately using these subjective assessments along with the experience of the therapist (usually a speech therapist), but newer, more objective measures are coming along. Recent studies have correlated pathological sucking patterns with neuroimaging data to get a map of the affected brain regions to better inform therapies. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad scope synopsis of the research field of infant nutritive and non-nutritive feeding, their underlying neurophysiology, and relationship of abnormal activity with brain injury in preterm and term infants.

Citing Articles

Measuring the time it takes to achieve full oral feeding can be used as a low-resource tool to assess neurologic recovery after perinatal asphyxia.

Tuiskula A, Haataja L, Metsaranta M J Trop Pediatr. 2025; 71(2).

PMID: 40036696 PMC: 11879012. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmaf012.


Determination of oral feeding skills in late preterm, early term, and full-term infants using the neonatal oral feeding monitor (NeoSAFE).

Ecevit A, Erdogan B, Anuk Ince D, Aksu M, Unal S, Turan O Ital J Pediatr. 2025; 51(1):38.

PMID: 39920842 PMC: 11806788. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-025-01867-2.


Does gene polymorphism affect the duration of orogastric tube use in moderate to late preterm neonates? A cross-sectional study in Indonesia.

Mauliza M, Dimiati H, Akmal M, Imran I Narra J. 2025; 4(3):e933.

PMID: 39816075 PMC: 11731792. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.211.


Optimizing infant neuroimaging methods to understand the neurodevelopmental impacts of early nutrition and feeding.

Carreno C, Evans M, Lockhart B, Chinaka O, Katz B, Bell M Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 71():101481.

PMID: 39647348 PMC: 11667636. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101481.


Are sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements related to later developmental functioning outcomes? A cohort study.

Yardimci-Lokmanoglu B, Demir N, Porsnok D, Sirtbas-Isik G, Cengiz E, Serel-Arslan S Eur J Pediatr. 2024; 183(3):1435-1446.

PMID: 38217695 PMC: 10951042. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05422-9.


References
1.
Kanda T, Pidcock F, Hayakawa K, Yamori Y, Shikata Y . Motor outcome differences between two groups of children with spastic diplegia who received different intensities of early onset physiotherapy followed for 5 years. Brain Dev. 2004; 26(2):118-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0387-7604(03)00111-6. View

2.
Capilouto G, Cunningham T, Giannone P, Grider D . A comparison of the nutritive sucking performance of full term and preterm neonates at hospital discharge: A prospective study. Early Hum Dev. 2019; 134:26-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.05.007. View

3.
Staudt M, Braun C, Gerloff C, Erb M, Grodd W, Krageloh-Mann I . Developing somatosensory projections bypass periventricular brain lesions. Neurology. 2006; 67(3):522-5. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000227937.49151.fd. View

4.
Wintermark P . Injury and repair in perinatal brain injury: Insights from non-invasive MR perfusion imaging. Semin Perinatol. 2015; 39(2):124-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.01.005. View

5.
Tamura Y, Horikawa Y, Yoshida S . Co-ordination of tongue movements and peri-oral muscle activities during nutritive sucking. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996; 38(6):503-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb12111.x. View