» Articles » PMID: 33507429

Monosynaptic Inference Via Finely-timed Spikes

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2021 Jan 28
PMID 33507429
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Observations of finely-timed spike relationships in population recordings have been used to support partial reconstruction of neural microcircuit diagrams. In this approach, fine-timescale components of paired spike train interactions are isolated and subsequently attributed to synaptic parameters. Recent perturbation studies strengthen the case for such an inference, yet the complete set of measurements needed to calibrate statistical models is unavailable. To address this gap, we study features of pairwise spiking in a large-scale in vivo dataset where presynaptic neurons were explicitly decoupled from network activity by juxtacellular stimulation. We then construct biophysical models of paired spike trains to reproduce the observed phenomenology of in vivo monosynaptic interactions, including both fine-timescale spike-spike correlations and firing irregularity. A key characteristic of these models is that the paired neurons are coupled by rapidly-fluctuating background inputs. We quantify a monosynapse's causal effect by comparing the postsynaptic train with its counterfactual, when the monosynapse is removed. Subsequently, we develop statistical techniques for estimating this causal effect from the pre- and post-synaptic spike trains. A particular focus is the justification and application of a nonparametric separation of timescale principle to implement synaptic inference. Using simulated data generated from the biophysical models, we characterize the regimes in which the estimators accurately identify the monosynaptic effect. A secondary goal is to initiate a critical exploration of neurostatistical assumptions in terms of biophysical mechanisms, particularly with regards to the challenging but arguably fundamental issue of fast, unobservable nonstationarities in background dynamics.

Citing Articles

Nondifferentiable activity in the brain.

Tsubo Y, Shinomoto S PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(7):pgae261.

PMID: 38994500 PMC: 11238849. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae261.


Identifying Effective Connectivity between Stochastic Neurons with Variable-Length Memory Using a Transfer Entropy Rate Estimator.

Izzi J, Ferreira R, Girardi V, Pena R Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790421 PMC: 11119028. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050442.


A convolutional neural network for estimating synaptic connectivity from spike trains.

Endo D, Kobayashi R, Bartolo R, Averbeck B, Sugase-Miyamoto Y, Hayashi K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12087.

PMID: 34103546 PMC: 8187444. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91244-w.

References
1.
Aertsen A, Gerstein G . Evaluation of neuronal connectivity: sensitivity of cross-correlation. Brain Res. 1985; 340(2):341-54. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90931-x. View

2.
Amarasingham A, Chen T, Geman S, Harrison M, Sheinberg D . Spike count reliability and the Poisson hypothesis. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(3):801-9. PMC: 6675384. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2948-05.2006. View

3.
Amarasingham A, Harrison M, Hatsopoulos N, Geman S . Conditional modeling and the jitter method of spike resampling. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 107(2):517-31. PMC: 3349623. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00633.2011. View

4.
Azouz R, Gray C . Adaptive coincidence detection and dynamic gain control in visual cortical neurons in vivo. Neuron. 2003; 37(3):513-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01186-8. View

5.
Brody . Correlations without synchrony. Neural Comput. 1999; 11(7):1537-51. DOI: 10.1162/089976699300016133. View