Contributions of Flow Cytometry to the Molecular Study of Spermatogenesis in Mammals

Overview

Journal Int J Mol Sci

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Molecular Biology

Date 2021 Jan 28

PMID 33503798

Citations 7

Authors

Rosana Rodriguez-Casuriaga

Adriana Geisinger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mammalian testes are very heterogeneous organs, with a high number of different cell types. Testicular heterogeneity, together with the lack of reliable in vitro culture systems of spermatogenic cells, have been an obstacle for the characterization of the molecular bases of the unique events that take place along the different spermatogenic stages. In this context, flow cytometry has become an invaluable tool for the analysis of testicular heterogeneity, and for the purification of stage-specific spermatogenic cell populations, both for basic research and for clinical applications. In this review, we highlight the importance of flow cytometry for the advances on the knowledge of the molecular groundwork of spermatogenesis in mammals. Moreover, we provide examples of different approaches to the study of spermatogenesis that have benefited from flow cytometry, including the characterization of mutant phenotypes, transcriptomics, epigenetic and genome-wide chromatin studies, and the attempts to establish cell culture systems for research and/or clinical aims such as infertility treatment.

Citing Articles

Long-term effects of sub-chronic exposure to L-NAME on reproductive system of male rats.

Gaonkar R, Pritmani J, Datar M, Singh D, Balasinor N, Nishi K Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024; .

PMID: 39545987 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03609-3.

Protamine 2 deficiency results in Septin 12 abnormalities.

Sanovec O, Frolikova M, Kraus V, Vondrakova J, Qasemi M, Spevakova D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1447630.

PMID: 39524225 PMC: 11543461. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1447630.

Uncovering a multitude of stage-specific splice variants and putative protein isoforms generated along mouse spermatogenesis.

Romeo-Cardeillac C, Trovero M, Radio S, Smircich P, Rodriguez-Casuriaga R, Geisinger A BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):295.

PMID: 38509455 PMC: 10953240. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10170-z.

Two complementary approaches for efficient isolation of Sertoli cells for transcriptomic analysis.

Petrusova J, Manning J, Kubovciak J, Kolar M, Filipp D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:972017.

PMID: 36158203 PMC: 9495933. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.972017.

Primary culture of germ cells that portray stem cell characteristics and recipient preparation for autologous transplantation in the rhesus monkey.

Yuan H, Sun J, Wang S, Xiang Z, Yang F, Yan Y J Cell Mol Med. 2022; 26(5):1567-1578.

PMID: 35104031 PMC: 8899175. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17197.

References

Komeya M, Sato T, Ogawa T . In vitro spermatogenesis: A century-long research journey, still half way around. Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 17(4):407-420. PMC: 6194268. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12225. View

Zhou R, Wu J, Liu B, Jiang Y, Chen W, Li J . The roles and mechanisms of Leydig cells and myoid cells in regulating spermatogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76(14):2681-2695. PMC: 11105226. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03101-9. View

Skene P, Henikoff J, Henikoff S . Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers. Nat Protoc. 2018; 13(5):1006-1019. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2018.015. View

Litchfield K, Levy M, Huddart R, Shipley J, Turnbull C . The genomic landscape of testicular germ cell tumours: from susceptibility to treatment. Nat Rev Urol. 2016; 13(7):409-19. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.107. View

Geisinger A, Benavente R . Mutations in Genes Coding for Synaptonemal Complex Proteins and Their Impact on Human Fertility. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2016; 150(2):77-85. DOI: 10.1159/000453344. View

Hogarth C, Evanoff R, Mitchell D, Kent T, Small C, Amory J . Turning a spermatogenic wave into a tsunami: synchronizing murine spermatogenesis using WIN 18,446. Biol Reprod. 2013; 88(2):40. PMC: 3589231. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.105346. View

Velte E, Niedenberger B, Serra N, Singh A, Roa-DeLaCruz L, Hermann B . Differential RA responsiveness directs formation of functionally distinct spermatogonial populations at the initiation of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Development. 2019; 146(12). PMC: 6602341. DOI: 10.1242/dev.173088. View

Lin X, Han M, Cheng L, Chen J, Zhang Z, Shen T . Expression dynamics, relationships, and transcriptional regulations of diverse transcripts in mouse spermatogenic cells. RNA Biol. 2016; 13(10):1011-1024. PMC: 5056783. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1218588. View

Ziloochi Kashani M, Bagher Z, Asgari H, Najafi M, Koruji M, Mehraein F . Differentiation of neonate mouse spermatogonial stem cells on three-dimensional agar/polyvinyl alcohol nanofiber scaffold. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020; 66(3):202-215. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2020.1725927. View

10.

Rossi P, Dolci S, Sette C, Capolunghi F, Pellegrini M, Loiarro M . Analysis of the gene expression profile of mouse male meiotic germ cells. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004; 4(3):267-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.modgep.2003.11.003. View

11.

Geisinger A, Rodriguez-Casuriaga R, Benavente R . Transcriptomics of Meiosis in the Male Mouse. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:626020. PMC: 7973102. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.626020. View

12.

Rodriguez-Casuriaga R, Santinaque F, Folle G, Souza E, Lopez-Carro B, Geisinger A . Rapid preparation of rodent testicular cell suspensions and spermatogenic stages purification by flow cytometry using a novel blue-laser-excitable vital dye. MethodsX. 2015; 1:239-43. PMC: 4473029. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2014.10.002. View

13.

Fayomi A, Orwig K . Spermatogonial stem cells and spermatogenesis in mice, monkeys and men. Stem Cell Res. 2018; 29:207-214. PMC: 6010318. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2018.04.009. View

14.

Gauthier-Fisher A, Kauffman A, Librach C . Potential use of stem cells for fertility preservation. Andrology. 2019; 8(4):862-878. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12713. View

15.

Shima J, McLean D, McCarrey J, Griswold M . The murine testicular transcriptome: characterizing gene expression in the testis during the progression of spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(1):319-30. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026880. View

16.

Tan K, Wilkinson M . A single-cell view of spermatogonial stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020; 67:71-78. PMC: 7736222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.07.005. View

17.

Richer G, Baert Y, Goossens E . In-vitro spermatogenesis through testis modelling: Toward the generation of testicular organoids. Andrology. 2019; 8(4):879-891. PMC: 7496450. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12741. View

18.

Cobb J, Handel M . Dynamics of meiotic prophase I during spermatogenesis: from pairing to division. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998; 9(4):445-50. DOI: 10.1006/scdb.1998.0202. View

19.

Go V, Vernon R, Fritz I . Studies on spermatogenesis in rats. I. Application of the sedimentation velocity technique to an investigation of spermatogenesis. Can J Biochem. 1971; 49(7):753-60. DOI: 10.1139/o71-106. View

20.

Neubauer K, Jewgenow K, Blottner S, Wildt D, Pukazhenthi B . Quantity rather than quality in teratospermic males: a histomorphometric and flow cytometric evaluation of spermatogenesis in the domestic cat (Felis catus). Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(5):1517-24. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.031062. View