» Articles » PMID: 33502701

Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jan 27
PMID 33502701
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ultra-endurance has been defined as any exercise bout that exceeds 6 h. A number of exceptional, record-breaking performances by female athletes in ultra-endurance sport have roused speculation that they might be predisposed to success in such events. Indeed, while the male-to-female performance gap in traditional endurance sport (e.g., marathon) remains at ~ 10%, the disparity in ultra-endurance competition has been reported as low as 4% despite the markedly lower number of female participants. Moreover, females generally outperform males in extreme-distance swimming. The issue is complex, however, with many sports-specific considerations and caveats. This review summarizes the sex-based differences in physiological functions and draws attention to those which likely determine success in extreme exercise endeavors. The aim is to provide a balanced discussion of the female versus male predisposition to ultra-endurance sport. Herein, we discuss sex-based differences in muscle morphology and fatigability, respiratory-neuromechanical function, substrate utilization, oxygen utilization, gastrointestinal structure and function, and hormonal control. The literature indicates that while females exhibit numerous phenotypes that would be expected to confer an advantage in ultra-endurance competition (e.g., greater fatigue resistance, greater substrate efficiency, and lower energetic demands), they also exhibit several characteristics that unequivocally impinge on performance (e.g., lower O-carrying capacity, increased prevalence of GI distress, and sex-hormone effects on cellular function/injury risk). Crucially, the advantageous traits may only manifest as ergogenic in the extreme endurance events which, paradoxically, are those that females less often contest. The title question should be revisited in the coming years, when/if the number of female participants increases.

Citing Articles

Analysis of the 50-mile ultramarathon distance using a predictive XGBoost model.

Turnwald J, Valero D, Forte P, Weiss K, Villiger E, Thuany M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):9016.

PMID: 40089510 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92581-w.


Muscle transcriptome profiles in elite male ultra-endurance athletes acclimated to a high-carbohydrate versus low-carbohydrate diet.

Saenz C, Lavin K, Lee E, Maresh C, Kraemer W, Bamman M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8419.

PMID: 40069235 PMC: 11897176. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88963-9.


Effect of oral contraceptive consumption timing on substrate metabolism, cognition, and exercise performance in females: a randomised controlled trial.

Martin D, Bargh M, Pennington K Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40029411 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05733-1.


Physiological Resilience: What Is It and How Might It Be Trained?.

Jones A, Kirby B Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025; 35(3):e70032.

PMID: 40024804 PMC: 11872681. DOI: 10.1111/sms.70032.


A Preliminary Study of Nutrients Related to the Risk of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in Top-Performing Female Amateur Triathletes: Results from a Nutritional Assessment.

Langa D, Naczyk M, Szymczak R, Karbowska J, Kochan Z Nutrients. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39861337 PMC: 11767317. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020208.


References
1.
Whipp B, Ward S . Will women soon outrun men?. Nature. 1992; 355(6355):25. DOI: 10.1038/355025a0. View

2.
Reinboud W . Linear models can't keep up with sport gender gap. Nature. 2004; 432(7014):147. DOI: 10.1038/432147a. View

3.
Zaryski C, Smith D . Training principles and issues for ultra-endurance athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005; 4(3):165-70. DOI: 10.1097/01.csmr.0000306201.49315.73. View

4.
Hoffman M, Ong J, Wang G . Historical analysis of participation in 161 km ultramarathons in North America. Int J Hist Sport. 2010; 27(11):1877-91. DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2010.494385. View

5.
Millet G, Hoffman M, Morin J . Sacrificing economy to improve running performance--a reality in the ultramarathon?. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012; 113(3):507-9. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00016.2012. View