» Articles » PMID: 3349979

Comparison of Isokinetic and Isoinertial Lifting Tests As Predictors of Maximal Lifting Capacity

Overview
Date 1988 Jan 1
PMID 3349979
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared the relationship between isokinetic lifting test (ILT) performance and a maximal operational lifting test (OLT) with that between an isoinertial progressive lifting test (PLT) and OLT. Fifty subjects performed the ILT, PLT and OLT after familiarization trials. OLT was defined as the weight of the heaviest crate that could be lifted to 1.34 m with a progressive, incremental test. ILT performance was the force generated during a single maximal simulated lift on an isokinetic dynamometer. PLT performance was the maximal weight lifted to 1.52 m with a progressive, incremental protocol on a weight stack. OLT was highly correlated with ILT (r = 0.96) and PLT (r = 0.97); the standard error was similar for both linear regression equations. The results demonstrate that a single maximal voluntary lift on an isokinetic dynamometer is as good a predictor of OLT as in the PLT presently used in military recruit centers.

Citing Articles

Concurrent validity of an isokinetic lift test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.

Bohman T, Tegern M, Halvarsson A, Broman L, Larsson H PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0207054.

PMID: 30399188 PMC: 6219807. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207054.


Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.

Matheson L, Danner R, Grant J, Mooney V J Occup Rehabil. 2013; 3(2):65-81.

PMID: 24243227 DOI: 10.1007/BF01078160.


A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Frost D, Cronin J, Newton R Sports Med. 2010; 40(4):303-26.

PMID: 20364875 DOI: 10.2165/11319420-000000000-00000.


Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Bos J, Kuijer P, Frings-Dresen M Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59(12):800-6.

PMID: 12468745 PMC: 1763594. DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.12.800.


The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

Fothergill D, Grieve D, Pinder A Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996; 72(5-6):430-9.

PMID: 8925813 DOI: 10.1007/BF00242272.


References
1.
Mital A, Vinayagamoorhty R . Three-dimensional dynamic strength measuring device: a prototype. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984; 45(12):B9-10, B12. View

2.
Mital A, Karwowski W, Mazouz A, Orsarh E . Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986; 47(5):288-92. DOI: 10.1080/15298668691390007. View

3.
Karwowski W, Mital A . Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork. Ergonomics. 1986; 29(7):869-78. DOI: 10.1080/00140138608967199. View

4.
KAMON E, Kiser D, Pytel J . Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982; 43(11):853-7. DOI: 10.1080/15298668291410684. View

5.
Pytel J, KAMON E . Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable lifting. Ergonomics. 1981; 24(9):663-72. DOI: 10.1080/00140138108924889. View