» Articles » PMID: 33495868

Intra- and Extradural Anterior Clinoidectomy: Anatomy Review and Surgical Technique Step by Step

Abstract

Purpose: The complex relations of the paraclinoid area make the surgical management of the pathology of this region a challenge. The anterior clinoid process (ACP) is an anatomical landmark that hinders the visualization and manipulation of the surrounding neurovascular structures, hence in certain surgical interventions might be necessary to remove it. We reviewed the anatomical relationships that involve the paraclinoid area and detailed the step-by-step techniques of intra and extradural clinoidectomy in cadaveric specimens.

Materials And Methods: A literature review was done describing the most relevant anatomic relationships regarding the anterior clinoid process. Extradural and intradural clinoidectomy techniques were performed in six dry bone heads and in ten previously injected cadaverous specimens with colored latex (Sanan et al. in Neurosurgery 45:1267-1274, 1999) and each step of the procedure was recorded using photographic material. Finally, an analysis of the anatomical exposure achieved in each of the techniques used was performed.

Results: The main advantage of the intradural clinoidectomy technique is the direct visualization of the neurovascular structures adjacent to the ACP when drilling, at the same time, opening the Sylvian fissure will allow the direct visualization of the ACP variants. The main advantage offered by the extradural technique is that the dura protects adjacent eloquent structures while drilling. Among the disadvantages, it is noted that the same dura that would protect the underlying structures also prevents the direct visualization of these neurovascular structures adjacent to the ACP.

Conclusion: We reviewed the anatomy of the paraclinoid area and made a step-by-step description of the technique of the anterior clinoidectomy in its intra- and extradural variants in cadaveric preparations for a better understanding.

Citing Articles

Pterional Craniotomy With Anterior Clinoidectomy for the Resection of a Sphenoid Ridge Meningioma: A Case Report and Two-Dimensional Operative Video.

Ding J, Liang B, Deng L, Nie E, Lu Y, Huang J Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49379.

PMID: 38149155 PMC: 10750440. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49379.


Clipping of Bilateral Ophthalmic Artery Aneurysms Through a Single Craniotomy.

Bocanegra-Becerra J, Koester S, Batista S, Perret C, Bertani R Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47291.

PMID: 38021998 PMC: 10659564. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47291.


Surgical Anatomy of the Microscopic and Endoscopic Transorbital Approach to the Middle Fossa and Cavernous Sinus: Anatomo-Radiological Study with Clinical Applications.

Serioli S, Nizzola M, Plou P, De Bonis A, Meyer J, Leonel L Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760405 PMC: 10527149. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184435.


Microsurgical and illustrative anatomy of the cavernous sinus, middle fossa, and paraclival triangles: a straightforward, comprehensive review.

Chavez-Herrera V, Campero A, Ballesteros-Herrera D, Sandoval-Bonilla B, Perez-Carrillo C, Soto-Rubio D Surg Radiol Anat. 2023; 45(4):389-400.

PMID: 36853414 PMC: 10039822. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-023-03105-y.

References
1.
Avci E, Bademci G, Ozturk A . Microsurgical landmarks for safe removal of anterior clinoid process. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005; 48(5):268-72. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-915595. View

2.
Bouthillier A, van Loveren H, Keller J . Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(3):425-32; discussion 432-3. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00001. View

3.
Chaddad-Neto F, Filho J, Doria-Netto H, Faria M, Ribas G, Oliveira E . The pterional craniotomy: tips and tricks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012; 70(9):727-32. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012000900015. View

4.
Chaddad Neto F, Ribas G, De Oliveira E . [The pterional craniotomy: step by step]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007; 65(1):101-6. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2007000100021. View

5.
de Jesus O . The clinoidal space: anatomical review and surgical implications. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997; 139(4):361-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF01808835. View