» Articles » PMID: 33491132

Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy with Machine Learning : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional predictive models are based on a combination of clinical and neuroimaging parameters using traditional statistical approaches. Emerging studies have shown that the machine learning (ML) prediction models with multiple pretreatment clinical variables have the potential to accurately prognosticate the outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing thrombectomy, and hence identify patients suitable for thrombectomy. This article summarizes the published studies on ML models in large vessel occlusion AIS patients undergoing thrombectomy.

Methods: We searched electronic databases including PubMed from 1 January 2000 up to 14 October 2019 for studies that evaluated ML algorithms for the prediction of outcomes in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. We then used random-effects bivariate meta-analysis models to summarize the studies.

Results: We retained a total of five studies that evaluated ML (4 support vector machine, 1 decision tree model) with a combined cohort of 802 patients. The prevalence of good functional outcome defined by 90-day mRS of 0-2 when available. Random effects model demonstrated that the AUC was 0.846 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.686-0.902). A pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 12.6 was computed. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.795 (95% CI 0.651-0.889) and 0.780 (95% CI 0.634-0.879), respectively.

Conclusion: ML may be useful as an adjunct to clinical assessment to predict functional outcomes in AIS patients undergoing thrombectomy, and hence identify suitable patients for treatment. Further studies validating ML models in large multicenter cohorts are necessary to explore this further.

Citing Articles

Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Q, Chi L, Zhao W, Wu L, Jiao C, Zheng X Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1039794.

PMID: 37388543 PMC: 10299899. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1039794.


Deep Learning-based Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Anatomy to Predict Difficult Intracranial Access in Endovascular Recanalization of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Nageler G, Gergel I, Fangerau M, Breckwoldt M, Seker F, Bendszus M Clin Neuroradiol. 2023; 33(3):783-792.

PMID: 36928398 PMC: 10449951. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-023-01276-0.


Machine learning based outcome prediction of large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation prior to thrombectomy in patients with wake-up stroke.

Feyen L, Blockhaus C, Katoh M, Haage P, Schaub C, Rohde S Interv Neuroradiol. 2022; 30(4):480-488.

PMID: 36344011 PMC: 11489961. DOI: 10.1177/15910199221135695.


Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Prediction of Patients' Functional Outcome and Mortality after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Guo R, Zhang R, Liu R, Liu Y, Li H, Ma L J Pers Med. 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35055424 PMC: 8778760. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010112.


Preprocedural Imaging : A Review of Different Radiological Factors Affecting the Outcome of Thrombectomy.

Jing M, Yeo J, Holmin S, Andersson T, Arnberg F, Bhogal P Clin Neuroradiol. 2021; 32(1):13-24.

PMID: 34709411 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01095-1.


References
1.
Yew K, Cheng E . Acute stroke diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 80(1):33-40. PMC: 2722757. View

2.
Ranganathan P, Pramesh C, Aggarwal R . Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression. Perspect Clin Res. 2017; 8(3):148-151. PMC: 5543767. DOI: 10.4103/picr.PICR_87_17. View

3.
Cuingnet R, Rosso C, Lehericy S, Dormont D, Benali H, Samson Y . Spatially regularized SVM for the detection of brain areas associated with stroke outcome. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010; 13(Pt 1):316-23. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_39. View

4.
Huang S, Cai N, Pacheco P, Narrandes S, Wang Y, Xu W . Applications of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Learning in Cancer Genomics. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2017; 15(1):41-51. PMC: 5822181. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20063. View