» Articles » PMID: 33489810

A Case Report of Exceptional Clinical Response to Chemoradiotherapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in a Patient with EML4-ALK Fusion Variant 1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 25
PMID 33489810
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion occurs in approximately 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Variants 1 and 3a/b are the most common EML4-ALK variants. Emerging evidence indicates that patients with variant 1 and those with variant 3a/b exhibit differential therapeutic responses. However, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines have not included the EML4-ALK fusion subtype in treatment decision-making to date. Herein, we report the case of a non-smoking 36-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with right lung adenocarcinoma in 2005 (cT1N3M0, IIIB) and received definitive chemoradiotherapy. The patient achieved a partial response, and her disease remained under control for 8 years. However, in May 2013, the patient was diagnosed with brain metastasis and underwent subsequent surgical resection, followed by postoperative brain radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Postoperative pathology confirmed ALK gene rearrangement, and next-generation sequencing performed in 2020 identified the EML4-ALK variant as variant 1. After progression-free survival lasting 4 years, new metastatic lesions were found in the patient's right lung, and she was administered crizotinib for 20 months. Due to a suspicious recurrence in the intracranial surgical margin area, as well as an unbearable gastrointestinal reaction to crizotinib, alectinib was later adopted. At the 7-month follow-up, positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed a clinical complete response. This case of an NSCLC patient with EML4-ALK fusion variant 1 who exhibited an exceptional response to chemoradiotherapy and ALK inhibitors might broaden horizons in efforts to reveal the molecular mechanism of radiosensitivity in ALK-positive NSCLC and provide reference for further research regarding the optimal radiotherapy delivery dose and tyrosine kinase inhibitor selection.

Citing Articles

Alternative Treatment Options to ALK Inhibitor Monotherapy for EML4-ALK-Driven Lung Cancer.

Papageorgiou S, Pashley S, ORegan L, Khan S, Bayliss R, Fry A Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(14).

PMID: 35884511 PMC: 9325236. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143452.

References
1.
Mogenet A, Tomasini P, Greillier L, Barlesi F . Lorlatinib: an additional option for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer?. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020; 8(Suppl 4):S383-S386. PMC: 6987344. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.05.10. View

2.
Ni J, Li G, Yang X, Chu L, Wang J, Li Y . Optimal timing and clinical value of radiotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with or without baseline brain metastases: implications from pattern of failure analyses. Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14(1):44. PMC: 6417092. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1240-1. View

3.
Curran Jr W, Paulus R, Langer C, Komaki R, Lee J, Hauser S . Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103(19):1452-60. PMC: 3186782. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr325. View

4.
Arrieta O, Ramirez-Tirado L, Caballe-Perez E, Mejia-Perez A, Zatarain-Barron Z, Cardona A . Response rate of patients with baseline brain metastases from recently diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy according to EGFR, ALK and KRAS mutation status. Thorac Cancer. 2020; 11(4):1026-1037. PMC: 7113051. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13359. View

5.
Solomon B, Mok T, Kim D, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T . First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2167-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440. View