» Articles » PMID: 33489591

Development and Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Adult Proximal Tibia Model for Simulation Training in Intraosseous Access

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2021 Jan 25
PMID 33489591
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intraosseous infusion remains an underutilized technique for obtaining vascular access in adults, despite its potentially life-saving benefits in trauma patients and those presenting to the emergency department. There is a scarcity of cost-effective, anatomically correct trainers to improve physician confidence and competency in this skill. The purpose of this report is to describe the development and evaluation of a three-dimensional (3D) printed Adult Proximal Intraosseous (IO) Tibia task trainer for simulation-based medical education. The proposed trainer was designed by combining open-source models of a human skeleton and a lower leg surface scan in Blender (Blender Foundation - www.blender.org) and manipulating them further using a JavaScript program. Polylactic acid was used to simulate bone while cured silicone moulds were used to replicate skin and soft tissue. Two trainers were produced and tested by 15 rural family medicine residents, six rural emergency medicine physicians, and six registered nurses. Participants evaluated the realism of the trainer and its efficacy as a training tool through a structured survey. The trainer received overall positive feedback from all participants, and most participants felt that no improvements were required to use the trainer for medical education. Notable suggestions for improvement included adding an infusion component, increasing the size of the tibial tubercle for better landmarking, and creating a variety of sizes for different patient body types. Residents and emergency medicine physicians practising in rural Newfoundland and Labrador found the 3D-printed trainer to be a practical tool for practising intraosseous technique. The outcome of this report supports the use of this cost-effective trainer for simulation-based medical education.

Citing Articles

Emerging Biomedical and Clinical Applications of 3D-Printed Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Devices and Delivery Systems.

Barcena A, Ravi P, Kundu S, Tappa K Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39061787 PMC: 11273440. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070705.


Barriers to utilization of intraosseous vascular access in pediatric emergencies.

Sombi H Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024; 11(3):309-313.

PMID: 39026450 PMC: 11467459. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.247.


Hacking Intraosseous Infusion Skills Training With 3D Printing: maxSIMIO Drilling System.

Clarke K, Micallef J, Jolly A, Sivanathan M, Siraj S, Button D Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31272.

PMID: 36514591 PMC: 9733789. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31272.


Development of Simple and Advanced Adult Proximal Tibia Simulators for a Decentralized Simulation-Based Education Model to Teach Paramedics-in-Training the Intraosseous Infusion Procedure.

Sivanathan M, Yanguez Franco L, Joshi S, Micallef J, Button D, Dubrowski A Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30929.

PMID: 36465780 PMC: 9711918. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30929.


The Development and Initial End-Point User Feedback of a 3D-Printed Adult Proximal Tibia IO Simulator.

Sivanathan M, Micallef J, Clarke K, Gino B, Joshi S, Abdo S Cureus. 2022; 14(5):e25481.

PMID: 35800805 PMC: 9246437. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25481.


References
1.
Afzali M, Kvisselgaard A, Viggers S . Early introduction of intraosseous access ought to be emphasized. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 35(2):355-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.062. View

2.
Petitpas F, Guenezan J, Vendeuvre T, Scepi M, Oriot D, Mimoz O . Use of intra-osseous access in adults: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016; 20:102. PMC: 4831096. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1277-6. View

3.
Leidel B, Kirchhoff C, Bogner V, Braunstein V, Biberthaler P, Kanz K . Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins. Resuscitation. 2011; 83(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.017. View

4.
Engels P, Erdogan M, Widder S, Butler M, Kureshi N, Martin K . Use of intraosseous devices in trauma: a survey of trauma practitioners in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Can J Surg. 2016; 59(6):374-382. PMC: 5125919. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011215. View

5.
Oriot D, Darrieux E, Boureau-Voultoury A, Ragot S, Scepi M . Validation of a performance assessment scale for simulated intraosseous access. Simul Healthc. 2012; 7(3):171-5. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31824a5c20. View