» Articles » PMID: 33489112

Electrosurgical Unit: Iatrogenic Injuries and Medico-legal Aspect. Italian Legal Rules, Experience and Article Review

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Jan 25
PMID 33489112
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of the electrosurgical unit (ESU) is well-established in the surgical practice. The Authors, to better understand the genesis of injuries connected to the use of electrosurgical instruments, conducted an in-depth literature review pertaining to this topic.

Materials And Method: Using the most important medical databases, a research of experimental studies in the last 20 years was conducted.

Results: The analysis of the mechanisms responsible for the lesions showed that high energy devices remain as the most common cause of injury. Adverse events are mainly given by thermal injuries; cases of electromagnetic interference are also described in patients with pacemakers or sacral nerve stimulator and spinal stimulators as well as cases of fire of the endotracheal tube in the course of tracheostomy for the use of the electrosurgical unit in an environment with a high concentration of oxygen or anesthetic gases. Also reported in the literature are individual cases of fires caused by sparks from the electrosurgical handpiece also for the use of disinfectants and/or in relation to surgical drapes.

Conclusion: In order to clearly define the medical-legal aspects, focusing on the professional responsibility of the surgical and nursing staff, the authors' attention was brought to the need for an effective prevention plan that highlights not only the importance of an accurate procedural knowledge in order to safety use the electrosurgical instruments, but also the need for a system that monitors any complications or adverse events resulting from the use of such instruments.

Citing Articles

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.

Watrowski R, Kostov S, Alkatout I Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021; 16(3):501-525.

PMID: 34691301 PMC: 8512506. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.108800.

References
1.
Lew E, Mittleman R, Murray D . Endotracheal tube ignition by electrocautery during tracheostomy: case report with autopsy findings. J Forensic Sci. 1991; 36(5):1586-91. View

2.
Morris M . Electrosurgery in the gastroenterology suite: principles, practice, and safety. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2006; 29(2):126-32. DOI: 10.1097/00001610-200603000-00006. View

3.
Alkatout I, Schollmeyer T, Hawaldar N, Sharma N, Mettler L . Principles and safety measures of electrosurgery in laparoscopy. JSLS. 2012; 16(1):130-9. PMC: 3407433. DOI: 10.4293/108680812X13291597716348. View

4.
Vancaillie T . Active electrode monitoring. How to prevent unintentional thermal injury associated with monopolar electrosurgery at laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(8):1009-12. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900769. View

5.
Tixier F, Garcon M, Rochefort F, Corvaisier S . Insulation failure in electrosurgery instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(11):4995-5001. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4844-7. View