» Articles » PMID: 33481957

Cross-cultural Perception of Female Facial Appearance: A Multi-ethnic and Multi-centre Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Jan 22
PMID 33481957
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans extract and use information from the face in assessments of physical appearance. Previous research indicates high agreement about facial attractiveness within and between cultures. However, the use of a narrow age range for facial stimuli, limitations due to unidirectional cross-cultural comparisons, and technical challenges have prevented definitive conclusions about the universality of face perception. In the present study, we imaged the faces of women aged 20 to 69 years in five locations (China, France, India, Japan, and South Africa) and secured age, attractiveness, and health assessments on continuous scales (0-100) from female and male raters (20-66 years) within and across ethnicity. In total, 180 images (36 of each ethnicity) were assessed by 600 raters (120 of each ethnicity), recruited in study centres in the five locations. Linear mixed model analysis revealed main and interaction effects of assessor ethnicity, assessor gender, and photographed participant ("face") ethnicity on age, attractiveness, and health assessments. Thus, differences in judgments of female facial appearance depend on the ethnicity of the photographed person, the ethnicity of the assessor, and whether the assessor is female or male. Facial age assessments correlated negatively with attractiveness and health assessments. Collectively, these findings provide evidence of cross-cultural variation in assessments of age, and even more of attractiveness, and health, indicating plasticity in perception of female facial appearance across cultures, although the decline in attractiveness and health assessments with age is universally found.

Citing Articles

Cultural Determinants of Body Image: What About the Menopausal Transition?.

Vincent C, Menard A, Giroux I Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791683 PMC: 11720564. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010076.


Clinical vs. chronological skin age: exploring determinants and stratum corneum protein markers of differential skin ageing in 351 healthy women.

Foucher A, Nouveau S, Piffaut V, Marque S, Aguilar L, Cavusoglu N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23643.

PMID: 39384829 PMC: 11464744. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65083-4.


Cross-cultural perception of strength, attractiveness, aggressiveness and helpfulness of Maasai male faces calibrated to handgrip strength.

Butovskaya M, Rostovstseva V, Mezentseva A, Kavina A, Rizwan M, Shi Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5880.

PMID: 38467751 PMC: 10928163. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56607-z.


Facial Beauty and the Correlation of Associated Attributes: An Empirical Aesthetic Database Study.

Singh P, Birkett L, Dhar S, Krumhuber E, Mosahebi A, Ponniah A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(1):e5382.

PMID: 38204867 PMC: 10781122. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005382.


Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities.

Liu A, Salinas C, Sharaf B Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023; 5:ojad046.

PMID: 37441561 PMC: 10335162. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojad046.


References
1.
Marcinkowska U, Ellison P, Galbarczyk A, Milkowska K, Pawlowski B, Thune I . Lack of support for relation between woman's masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context. Horm Behav. 2015; 78:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.012. View

2.
Gray A, Boothroyd L . Female facial appearance and health. Evol Psychol. 2012; 10(1):66-77. PMC: 10426873. View

3.
Apicella C, Little A, Marlowe F . Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception. 2008; 36(12):1813-20. DOI: 10.1068/p5601. View

4.
Jones D, Hill K . Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat. 2013; 4(3):271-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF02692202. View

5.
Kocnar T, Saribay S, Kleisner K . Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225549. PMC: 6872208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225549. View