» Articles » PMID: 33481185

Intra-skeletal Vascular Density in a Bipedal Hopping Macropod with Implications for Analyses of Rib Histology

Overview
Journal Anat Sci Int
Date 2021 Jan 22
PMID 33481185
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human ribs are thought to be less affected by mechanical strain at the microscopic level than limb bones, implying that rib remodelling better reflects bone physiological homeostasis. Here, we test the hypothesis that rib tissue will be well vascularized and thus enhance susceptibility to metabolic influence. An intra-skeletal comparison of bone vascular canal density was conducted using a macropod animal model adapted to bipedal habitual hopping. The right humerus, ulna, radius, femur, tibia, fibula, a mid-thoracic and upper-thoracic rib of an eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) were sectioned at the midshaft, from which histological sections were prepared. Bone vascularity from a maximum of 12 mm of sub-periosteal parallel-fibred and lamellar bone was recorded, resulting in a total of 2047 counted vessels. Vascular canal density data were corrected by cortical width, maximum length, and midshaft circumference robusticity indices computed for each bone. The fibula consistently had the highest vascular canal density, even when corrected for maximum length, cortical width and midshaft circumference robusticities. This was followed by the mid- and upper-thoracic ribs. Vascularity differences between bones were relatively consistent whether vascular canal density was controlled for by cortical width or midshaft circumference robusticities. Vascular canal density and robusticity indices were also positively and negatively correlated (p < 0.05). Results confirm that the ribs are well vascularized, which facilitates bone metabolic processes such as remodelling, but the fibula also appears to be a well vascularized bone. Future research investigating human bone metabolism will benefit from examining thoracic rib or fibula samples.

Citing Articles

Age-dependent change and intraskeletal variability in secondary osteons of elderly Australians.

Pedersen L, Miszkiewicz J, Cheah L, Willis A, Domett K J Anat. 2024; 244(6):1078-1092.

PMID: 38238907 PMC: 11095313. DOI: 10.1111/joa.14010.

References
1.
Britz H, Jokihaara J, Leppanen O, Jarvinen T, Cooper D . The effects of immobilization on vascular canal orientation in rat cortical bone. J Anat. 2011; 220(1):67-76. PMC: 3248664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01450.x. View

2.
Cho H, Stout S . Age-associated bone loss and intraskeletal variability in the Imperial Romans. J Anthropol Sci. 2011; 89:109-25. DOI: 10.4436/jass.89007. View

3.
Cooper D, Kawalilak C, Harrison K, Johnston B, Johnston J . Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016; 14(5):187-98. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-016-0319-y. View

4.
Crowder C, Rosella L . Assessment of intra- and intercostal variation in rib histomorphometry: its impact on evidentiary examination. J Forensic Sci. 2007; 52(2):271-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00388.x. View

5.
Currey J . Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions. J Biomech. 1979; 12(4):313-9. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(79)90073-3. View