» Articles » PMID: 33475397

Semantic Influences on Episodic Memory Distortions

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Jan 21
PMID 33475397
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior knowledge has long been known to shape new episodic memories. However, it is less clear how prior knowledge can scaffold the learning of a new class of information, and how this can bias memory for the episodes that contributed to its acquisition. We aimed to quantify distortions in episodic memories resulting from the use of prior category knowledge to facilitate learning new information. Across 4 experiments, participants encoded and retrieved image-location associations. Most members of a category (e.g., birds) were located near each other, such that participants could leverage their prior category knowledge to learn the spatial locations of categories as they encoded specific image locations. Critically, some typical and atypical category members were in random locations. We decomposed location memory into 2 measures: error, a measure of episodic specificity; and bias toward other category members, a measure of the influence of newly-learned information about category locations. First, we found that location memory was more accurate for images whose locations were spatially consistent with their category membership. Second, when images were spatially inconsistent (i.e., in random locations), retrieval of typical category members was more biased toward their category's location relative to atypical ones. These effects replicated across 3 experiments, disappeared when images were not arranged by category, and were stronger than effects observed with images arranged by visual similarity rather than category membership. Our observations provide compelling evidence that memory is a reconstruction of multiple sources of prior knowledge, new learning, and memory for specific events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Neural codes track prior events in a narrative and predict subsequent memory for details.

Collin S, Kempner R, Srivatsan S, Norman K Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):26.

PMID: 39956878 PMC: 11830764. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00211-y.


Schemas, reinforcement learning and the medial prefrontal cortex.

Bein O, Niv Y Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025; 26(3):141-157.

PMID: 39775183 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00893-z.


Object Feature Memory Is Distorted by Category Structure.

Tandoc M, Dong C, Schapiro A Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1348-1368.

PMID: 39654820 PMC: 11627532. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00170.


Integration of overlapping sequences emerges with consolidation through medial prefrontal cortex neural ensembles and hippocampal-cortical connectivity.

Tompary A, Davachi L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39545928 PMC: 11567667. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84359.


Distinct mechanisms and functions of episodic memory.

Cheng S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1913):20230411.

PMID: 39278239 PMC: 11482257. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0411.


References
1.
Goldstone R . Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994; 123(2):178-200. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.178. View

2.
Hunt R, Lamb C . What causes the isolation effect?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(6):1359-66. View

3.
Duffy S, Huttenlocher J, Hedges L, Crawford L . Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010; 17(2):224-30. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.224. View

4.
Sweegers C, Talamini L . Generalization from episodic memories across time: a route for semantic knowledge acquisition. Cortex. 2014; 59:49-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.006. View

5.
Morris P, Fritz C . Effect sizes in memory research. Memory. 2013; 21(7):832-42. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.763984. View