» Articles » PMID: 33474522

Patient and Provider Satisfaction With Telemedicine in Otolaryngology

Overview
Journal OTO Open
Date 2021 Jan 21
PMID 33474522
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine encounters across 3 otolaryngology practices.

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: A military community hospital, an academic military hospital, and a nonmilitary academic center.

Methods: A telephone-based survey of patients undergoing telemedicine encounters for routine otolaryngology appointments was performed between April and July 2020. Patients were asked about their satisfaction, the factors affecting care, and demographic information. A provider survey was emailed to staff otolaryngologists. The survey asked about satisfaction, concerns for reimbursement or liability, encounters best suited for telemedicine, and demographic information. The results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic linear regression model to determine odds ratios.

Results: A total of 325 patients were surveyed, demonstrating high satisfaction with telemedicine (average score, 4.49 of 5 [best possible answer]). Patients perceived "no negative impact" or "minor negative impact" on the encounter due to the lack of a physical examination or face-to-face interaction (1.86 and 1.95 of 5, respectively). High satisfaction was consistent across groups for distance to travel, age, and reason for referral. A total of 25 providers were surveyed, with an average satisfaction score of 3.44 of 5. Providers reported "slight" to "somewhat" concern about reimbursement (40%) and liability (32%).

Conclusion: Given patients' and providers' levels of satisfaction, there is likely a role for telemedicine in otolaryngology practice that may benefit patient care independent of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citing Articles

Ethical acceptability of telemedicine: Nursing home resident's perspective on telemedical consultations.

Sira N, Gross D, Wilhelmy S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241288368.

PMID: 39484651 PMC: 11526395. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241288368.


Economic, Environmental, and Social Value of Virtual Care in Otolaryngology: Sustainability in Quality Improvement Framework.

Paczkowski F, Gandhi K, Dzioba A, MacNeil D, Parnes L, Davey G Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 172(2):717-727.

PMID: 39435654 PMC: 11773438. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.1013.


Assessing the Usability and Effectiveness of an AI-Powered Telehealth Platform: Mixed Methods Study on the Perspectives of Patients and Providers.

Jain E, Gupta S, Yadav V, Kachnowski S JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e62742.

PMID: 39418632 PMC: 11629036. DOI: 10.2196/62742.


A Comparison of In-Person and Telemedicine Triage in Otolaryngology.

Hoerter J, Debbaneh P, Liu K, Shah S, Weintraub M, Jiang N Perm J. 2024; 28(4):31-37.

PMID: 39290057 PMC: 11648324. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/24.077.


Hybrid care potential of teledermatology: The importance of linking digital and physical practice and acceptance of online services: A cross-sectional study.

Hindelang M, Tizek L, Harders C, Sommer-Eska L Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(7):e2241.

PMID: 38983681 PMC: 11231929. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2241.


References
1.
Rimmer R, Christopher V, Falck A, de Azevedo Pribitkin E, Curry J, Luginbuhl A . Telemedicine in otolaryngology outpatient setting-single Center Head and Neck Surgery experience. Laryngoscope. 2018; 128(9):2072-2075. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27123. View

2.
Pedersen S, Holand U . Tele-endoscopic otorhinolaryngological examination: preliminary study of patient satisfaction. Telemed J. 1995; 1(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.47. View

3.
Wu C, Wu S, Chen P, Lin Y . An innovative smartphone-based otorhinoendoscope and its application in mobile health and teleotolaryngology. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(3):e71. PMC: 3961810. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2959. View

4.
Sandberg J, Trief P, Izquierdo R, Goland R, Morin P, Palmas W . A qualitative study of the experiences and satisfaction of direct telemedicine providers in diabetes case management. Telemed J E Health. 2009; 15(8):742-50. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0027. View

5.
Ning A, Cabrera C, DAnza B . Telemedicine in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Image Quality, Diagnostic Concordance, and Patient and Provider Satisfaction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020; 130(2):195-204. DOI: 10.1177/0003489420939590. View