» Articles » PMID: 33472778

Effective Coverage of Nutrition Interventions Across the Continuum of Care in Bangladesh: Insights from Nationwide Cross-sectional Household and Health Facility Surveys

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jan 21
PMID 33472778
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Improving the impact of nutrition interventions requires adequate measurement of both reach and quality of interventions, but limited evidence exists on advancing coverage measurement. We adjusted contact-based coverage estimates, taking into consideration the inputs required to deliver quality nutrition services, to calculate input-adjusted coverage of nutrition interventions across the continuum of care from pregnancy through early childhood in Bangladesh.

Methods: We used data from the 2014 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys to assess use of maternal and child health services and the 2014 Service Provision Assessment to determine facility readiness to deliver nutrition interventions. Service readiness captured availability of nutrition-specific inputs (including human resources and training, equipment, diagnostics and medicines). Contact coverage was combined with service readiness to create a measure of input-adjusted coverage at the national and regional levels, across place of residence, and by maternal education and household socioeconomic quintiles.

Results: Contact coverage varied from 28% for attending at least four ANC visits to 38% for institutional delivery, 35% for child growth monitoring and 81% for sick child care. Facilities demonstrated incomplete readiness for nutrition interventions, ranging from 48% to 51% across services. Nutrition input-adjusted coverage was suboptimal (18% for ANC, 23% for institutional delivery, 20% for child growth monitoring and 52% for sick child care) and varied between regions within the country. Inequalities in input-adjusted coverage were large during ANC and institutional delivery (14-17 percentage points (pp) between urban and rural areas, 15 pp between low and high education, and 28-34 pp between highest and lowest wealth quintiles) and less variable for sick child care (<2 pp).

Conclusion: Nutrition input-adjusted coverage was suboptimal and varied subnationally and across the continuum of care in Bangladesh. Special efforts are needed to improve the reach as well as the quality of health and nutrition services to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

Citing Articles

Effective coverage of maternal and neonatal healthcare services in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Kassie A, Eakin E, Endalamaw A, Zewdie A, Wolka E, Assefa Y BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1601.

PMID: 39695753 PMC: 11654249. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12085-7.


Association between antenatal care facility readiness and provision of care at the client level and facility level in five low- and middle-income countries.

Sheffel A, Carter E, Zeger S, Munos M BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1109.

PMID: 37848885 PMC: 10583346. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10106-5.


Operationalising effective coverage measurement of facility based childbirth in Gombe State; a comparison of data sources.

Exley J, Bhattacharya A, Hanson C, Shuaibu A, Umar N, Marchant T PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(4):e0000359.

PMID: 36962182 PMC: 10021305. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000359.


Existing gaps and missed opportunities in delivering quality nutrition services in primary healthcare: a descriptive analysis of patient experience and provider competence in 11 low-income and middle-income countries.

Ramadan M, Muthee T, Okara L, Feil C, Uribe M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(2):e064819.

PMID: 36854587 PMC: 9980366. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064819.


Measuring effective coverage of maternal and child health services in Cambodia: a retrospective analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 2005 to 2014.

Kim M, Kim S, Oh J, Kim C, Arsenault C BMJ Open. 2023; 12(9):e062028.

PMID: 36691182 PMC: 9454061. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062028.


References
1.
Donabedian A . Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005; 83(4):691-729. PMC: 2690293. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x. View

2.
Ahmed S, Evans T, Standing H, Mahmud S . Harnessing pluralism for better health in Bangladesh. Lancet. 2013; 382(9906):1746-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62147-9. View

3.
Gillespie S, Menon P, Heidkamp R, Piwoz E, Rawat R, Munos M . Measuring the coverage of nutrition interventions along the continuum of care: time to act at scale. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(Suppl 4):e001290. PMC: 6590959. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001290. View

4.
Chou V, Walker N, Kanyangarara M . Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study. PLoS Med. 2019; 16(12):e1002990. PMC: 6919595. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002990. View

5.
Sheffel A, Zeger S, Heidkamp R, Munos M . Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(12):e032558. PMC: 7003378. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558. View