» Articles » PMID: 33471165

PHI Density Prospectively Improves Prostate Cancer Detection

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2021 Jan 20
PMID 33471165
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) density (PHID) in direct comparison with PHI in a prospective large cohort.

Methods: PHID values were calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA and [- 2]proPSA and prostate volume. The 1057 patients included 552 men with prostate cancer (PCa) and 505 with no evidence of malignancy (NEM). In detail, 562 patients were biopsied at the Charité Hospital Berlin and 495 patients at the Sana Hospital Offenbach. All patients received systematic or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing areas under the ROC-curves (AUC). The decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed with the MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox.

Results: PHID provided a significant larger AUC than PHI (0.835 vs. 0.801; p = 0.0013) in our prospective cohort of 1057 men from 2 centers. The DCA had a maximum net benefit of ~ 5% for PHID vs. PHI between 35 and 65% threshold probability. In those 698 men within the WHO-calibrated PSA grey-zone up to 8 ng/ml, PHID was also significantly better than PHI (AUC 0.819 vs. 0.789; p = 0.0219). But PHID was not different from PHI in the detection of significant PCa.

Conclusions: Based on ROC analysis and DCA, PHID had an advantage in comparison with PHI alone to detect any PCa but PHI and PHID performed equal in detecting significant PCa.

Citing Articles

An online clustering algorithm predicting model for prostate cancer based on PHI-related variables and PI-RADS in different PSA populations.

Hu J, Miao Q, Ren J, Su H, Zhang X, Bi J Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):44.

PMID: 39948672 PMC: 11827463. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03677-2.


Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy.

Press B, Lokeshwar S, Webb L, Khajir G, Smani S, Olawoyin O Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 5(6):1168-1176.

PMID: 39465014 PMC: 11502073. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00269.


Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects.

Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N World J Mens Health. 2024; 43(1):8-27.

PMID: 38772530 PMC: 11704174. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386.


Comparison of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Its Density and Prostate Health Index and Its Density for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Boo Y, Chung J, Kang M, Sung H, Jeon H, Jeong B Biomedicines. 2023; 11(7).

PMID: 37509551 PMC: 10377372. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071912.


Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracy across prostate health index, prostate health index density, and percentage free prostate-specific antigen for clinically significant prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic study.

Wu B, Shao Y, Lin X, Hasi C, Jia W, Wang D Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(3):425-432.

PMID: 37032752 PMC: 10080357. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-80.


References
1.
Jansen F, van Schaik R, Kurstjens J, Horninger W, Klocker H, Bektic J . Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(6):921-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003. View

2.
Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Haese A, McNicholas T, De La Taille A, Buffi N . Clinical performance of prostate health index in men with tPSA>10ng/ml: Results from a multicentric European study. Urol Oncol. 2016; 34(9):415.e13-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.04.003. View

3.
Huang D, Wu Y, Ye D, Qi J, Liu F, Helfand B . Prostate volume does not provide additional predictive value to prostate health index for prostate cancer or clinically significant prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study in China. Asian J Androl. 2020; 22(5):539-543. PMC: 7523603. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_136_19. View

4.
Catalona W, Partin A, Sanda M, Wei J, Klee G, Bangma C . A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol. 2011; 185(5):1650-5. PMC: 3140702. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032. View

5.
Chiu P, Ng C, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A . A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2018; 75(4):558-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. View