» Articles » PMID: 33470498

The Esthetic Biological Contour Concept for Implant Restoration Emergence Profile Design

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Jan 20
PMID 33470498
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Emergence profile design is important for stable peri-implant tissues and esthetically pleasing results with dental implant restorations, influenced by factors, such as, implant position and surrounding soft tissues. Different aspects of the emergence profile have been described, but detailed explanations of the different zones and corresponding designs are missing. This article describes the esthetic biological contour concept (EBC), differentiating important areas of the emergence profile and recommending particular designs for those zones.

Overview: The EBC concept considers specific parameters for proper design of the emergence profile of implant-supported restorations. Understanding the different zones of the emergence profile and their relation to factors like implant position, implant design, and soft tissue thickness is key. The suggested guidelines are geared toward providing more stable and esthetic results when restoring dental implants in the esthetic zone.

Conclusions: Each of the zones described in the EBC concept have a specific function in the design of the emergence profile. Understanding the importance and specific design features of the EBC zones facilitates esthetic and biologically sound treatment outcomes with interim and definitive implant restorations.

Clinical Significance: Proper emergence profile design supports esthetic outcomes and provides favorable biological response to implant-supported restorations.

Citing Articles

Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning of immediate posterior implants by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments: a randomized clinical trial.

Elgendi M, Hamdy I, Sallam H BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):83.

PMID: 39819325 PMC: 11740560. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05417-w.


3D analysis of soft tissue dimensional changes after dental implant placement with butt-joint vs. conical connection: a 12-month randomized control trial.

Derakhshani A, Beuer F, Bose M, Herklotz I, Unkovskiy A Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):66.

PMID: 39699822 PMC: 11659537. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00585-4.


Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments.

Ruhstorfer M, Guth J, Stimmelmayr M, Waltenberger L, Schubert O, Graf T Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):61.

PMID: 39661263 PMC: 11635071. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00581-8.


Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Morphology on the Outcomes of Implant Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Barwacz C, Swenson M, Couso-Queiruga E, Comnick C, Xie X, Avila-Ortiz G Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 36(3):374-385.

PMID: 39641983 PMC: 11891029. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14389.


A comparative study of the prognostic outcomes of periodontal soft tissue health in traditional restoration and micro-invasive restoration with the use of microscopy.

Wang P, Zhang L, Chen C, Yu Q Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(9):4761-4769.

PMID: 39398559 PMC: 11470303. DOI: 10.62347/SPPS5166.