» Articles » PMID: 33469818

Comparison of a Bayesian Estimation Algorithm and Singular Value Decomposition Algorithms for 80-detector Row CT Perfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Jan 20
PMID 33469818
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A variety of postprocessing algorithms for CT perfusion are available, with substantial differences in terms of quantitative maps. Although potential advantages of a Bayesian estimation algorithm are suggested, direct comparison with other algorithms in clinical settings remains scarce. We aimed to compare performance of a Bayesian estimation algorithm and singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithms for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke using an 80-detector row CT perfusion.

Methods: CT perfusion data of 36 patients with acute ischemic stroke were analyzed using the Vitrea implemented a standard SVD algorithm, a reformulated SVD algorithm and a Bayesian estimation algorithm. Correlations and statistical differences between affected and contralateral sides of quantitative parameters (cerebral blood volume [CBV], cerebral blood flow [CBF], mean transit time [MTT], time to peak [TTP] and delay) were analyzed. Agreement of the CT perfusion-estimated and the follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging-derived infarct volume were evaluated by nonparametric Passing-Bablok regression analysis.

Results: CBF and MTT of the Bayesian estimation algorithm were substantially different and showed a better correlation with the standard SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.78 and 0.80, p < 0.001) than with the reformulated SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.59 and 0.39, p < 0.001). There is no significant difference in MTT only when using the reformulated SVD algorithm (p = 0.217). Regarding the regression lines, the slope and intercept were nearly ideal with the Bayesian estimation algorithm (y = 2.42 x-6.51; ρ = 0.60, p < 0.001) in comparison with the SVD algorithms.

Conclusions: The Bayesian estimation algorithm can lead to a better performance compared with the SVD algorithms in the assessment of acute ischemic stroke because of better delineation of abnormal perfusion areas and accurate estimation of infarct volume.

Citing Articles

Deep learning-based correction for time truncation in cerebral computed tomography perfusion.

Ichikawa S, Ozaki M, Itadani H, Sugimori H, Kondo Y Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(3):666-678.

PMID: 38861134 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00818-6.


Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Stroke: A Narrative Review of United States Food and Drug Administration-Approved Technologies.

Chandrabhatla A, Kuo E, Sokolowski J, Kellogg R, Park M, Mastorakos P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37297949 PMC: 10253618. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113755.


Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion.

Suo S, Zhao Z, Zhao H, Zhang J, Zhao B, Xu J Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(8):5687-5697.

PMID: 37022438 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09557-5.


Correlation between pretreatment and follow-up infarct volume using CT perfusion imaging: the Bayesian versus singular value decomposition method.

Kawano H, Adachi T, Saito M, Amano T, Gomyo M, Yokoyama K Neurol Sci. 2023; 44(6):2041-2047.

PMID: 36689012 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06627-w.


A Narrative Review on LI-RADS Algorithm in Liver Tumors: Prospects and Pitfalls.

De Muzio F, Grassi F, DellAversana F, Fusco R, Danti G, Flammia F Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35885561 PMC: 9319674. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071655.


References
1.
Mayer T, Hamann G, Baranczyk J, Rosengarten B, Klotz E, Wiesmann M . Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(8):1441-9. PMC: 7974057. View

2.
Powers W, Rabinstein A, Ackerson T, Adeoye O, Bambakidis N, Becker K . 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49(3):e46-e110. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. View

3.
Fahmi F, Marquering H, Streekstra G, Beenen L, Velthuis B, VanBavel E . Differences in CT perfusion summary maps for patients with acute ischemic stroke generated by 2 software packages. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(11):2074-80. PMC: 7965595. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3110. View

4.
Austein F, Riedel C, Kerby T, Meyne J, Binder A, Lindner T . Comparison of Perfusion CT Software to Predict the Final Infarct Volume After Thrombectomy. Stroke. 2016; 47(9):2311-7. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013147. View

5.
Kudo K, Christensen S, Sasaki M, Ostergaard L, Shirato H, Ogasawara K . Accuracy and reliability assessment of CT and MR perfusion analysis software using a digital phantom. Radiology. 2012; 267(1):201-11. PMC: 3606546. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112618. View