» Articles » PMID: 33467145

Patterns of Epigenetic Diversity in Two Sympatric Fish Species: Genetic Vs. Environmental Determinants

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jan 20
PMID 33467145
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epigenetic components are hypothesized to be sensitive to the environment, which should permit species to adapt to environmental changes. In wild populations, epigenetic variation should therefore be mainly driven by environmental variation. Here, we tested whether epigenetic variation (DNA methylation) observed in wild populations is related to their genetic background, and/or to the local environment. Focusing on two sympatric freshwater fish species ( and ), we tested the relationships between epigenetic differentiation, genetic differentiation (using microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers), and environmental distances between sites. We identify positive relationships between pairwise genetic and epigenetic distances in both species. Moreover, epigenetic marks better discriminated populations than genetic markers, especially in . In , both pairwise epigenetic and genetic distances were significantly associated to environmental distances between sites. Nonetheless, when controlling for genetic differentiation, the link between epigenetic differentiation and environmental distances was not significant anymore, indicating a noncausal relationship. Our results suggest that fish epigenetic variation is mainly genetically determined and that the environment weakly contributed to epigenetic variation. We advocate the need to control for the genetic background of populations when inferring causal links between epigenetic variation and environmental heterogeneity in wild populations.

Citing Articles

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of (Basilesky, 1855) in Xinjiang Tarim River.

Sun S, Hu Z, Lu Z, Liu L, Liu X, Zhou Q Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(10).

PMID: 36292675 PMC: 9601685. DOI: 10.3390/genes13101790.


Population Epigenetics: The Extent of DNA Methylation Variation in Wild Animal Populations.

Chapelle V, Silvestre F Epigenomes. 2022; 6(4).

PMID: 36278677 PMC: 9589984. DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes6040031.


Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns harbour signatures of hatchling sex and past incubation temperature in a species with environmental sex determination.

Bock S, Smaga C, McCoy J, Parrott B Mol Ecol. 2022; 31(21):5487-5505.

PMID: 35997618 PMC: 9826120. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16670.


Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Leigh D, van Rees C, Millette K, Breed M, Schmidt C, Bertola L Nat Rev Genet. 2021; 22(12):791-807.

PMID: 34408318 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00394-0.


Evolutionary Dynamics of Wild Populations.

Legrand D, Blanchet S Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(5).

PMID: 34069746 PMC: 8161051. DOI: 10.3390/genes12050778.

References
1.
Gama-Sosa M, Midgett R, Slagel V, Githens S, KUO K, GEHRKE C . Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983; 740(2):212-9. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4781(83)90079-9. View

2.
Nosil P, Funk D, Ortiz-Barrientos D . Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18(3):375-402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03946.x. View

3.
Sheldon E, Schrey A, Andrew S, Ragsdale A, Griffith S . Epigenetic and genetic variation among three separate introductions of the house sparrow () into Australia. R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(4):172185. PMC: 5936936. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172185. View

4.
Fourtune L, Prunier J, Paz-Vinas I, Loot G, Veyssiere C, Blanchet S . Inferring Causalities in Landscape Genetics: An Extension of Wright's Causal Modeling to Distance Matrices. Am Nat. 2018; 191(4):491-508. DOI: 10.1086/696233. View

5.
Hawes N, Amadoru A, Tremblay L, Pochon X, Dunphy B, Fidler A . Epigenetic patterns associated with an ascidian invasion: a comparison of closely related clades in their native and introduced ranges. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):14275. PMC: 6776620. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49813-7. View