» Articles » PMID: 33466226

Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract to Prevent Postoperative Pneumonia and Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Jan 20
PMID 33466226
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infectious complications occur frequently after esophagectomy. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been shown to reduce postoperative infections and anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery, but robust evidence for esophageal surgery is lacking. The aim was to evaluate the association between SDD and pneumonia, surgical-site infections (SSIs), anastomotic leakage, and 1-year mortality after esophagectomy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in four Dutch hospitals between 2012 and 2018. Two hospitals used SDD perioperatively and two did not. SDD consisted of an oral paste and suspension (containing amphotericin B, colistin, and tobramycin). The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative pneumonia and SSIs. Secondary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and 1-year mortality. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between SDD and the relevant outcomes (odds ratio (OR)). A total of 496 patients were included, of whom 179 received SDD perioperatively and the other 317 patients did not receive SDD. Patients who received SDD were less likely to develop postoperative pneumonia (20.1% vs. 36.9%, < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (10.6% vs. 19.9%, = 0.008). Multivariate analysis showed that SDD is an independent protective factor for postoperative pneumonia (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.67, < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.84, = 0.011). Use of perioperative SDD seems to be associated with a lower risk of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Citing Articles

Preoperative bowel preparation promotes intestinal functional recovery after esophagectomy.

Ma J, Chen S, Ren X, Han H, Gong M, Song Y Afr Health Sci. 2024; 23(3):540-546.

PMID: 38357145 PMC: 10862592. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.62.


[Change of strategy to minimally invasive esophagectomy-Results at a certified center].

Merboth F, Hasanovic J, Stange D, Distler M, Kaden S, Weitz J Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2021; 93(7):694-701.

PMID: 34932142 PMC: 9246796. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01550-2.


Impact of Healthcare-Associated Infections Connected to Medical Devices-An Update.

Chandra Teja Dadi N, Radochova B, Vargova J, Bujdakova H Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34835457 PMC: 8618630. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112332.

References
1.
Bludau M, Holscher A, Bollschweiler E, Leers J, Gutschow C, Brinkmann S . Preoperative airway colonization prior to transthoracic esophagectomy predicts postoperative pulmonary complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015; 400(6):707-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1326-7. View

2.
Tetteroo G, Wagenvoort J, Castelein A, Tilanus H, Ince C, Bruining H . Selective decontamination to reduce gram-negative colonisation and infections after oesophageal resection. Lancet. 1990; 335(8691):704-7. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90813-k. View

3.
Xie M, Liu C, Guo M, Mei X, Sun X, Xu M . Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97(5):1721-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.054. View

4.
Lewis I . The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 2010; 34:18-31. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.18003413304. View

5.
van Workum F, Stenstra M, Berkelmans G, Slaman A, van Berge Henegouwen M, Gisbertz S . Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2017; 269(1):88-94. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002469. View