» Articles » PMID: 33465346

Convergent Neuroendocrine Mechanisms of Social Buffering and Stress Contagion

Overview
Journal Horm Behav
Date 2021 Jan 19
PMID 33465346
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social interactions play a key role in modulating the impact of stressful experiences. In some cases, social interactions can result in social buffering, the process in which the presence of one individual reduces the physiological and behavioral impact of stress in another individual. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that a key initiating factor of social buffering behaviors is the initiation of an anxiogenic state in the individual that was not directly exposed to the stress. This is referred to as stress contagion (a form of emotion contagion). Both processes involve the transmission of social information, suggesting that contagion and buffering could share similar neural mechanisms. In general, mechanistic studies of contagion and buffering are considered separately, even though behavioral studies show that a degree of contagion is usually necessary for social buffering behaviors to occur. Here we consider the extent to which the neuropeptides corticotropin releasing hormone and oxytocin are involved in contagion and stress buffering. We also assess the importance that frontal cortical areas such as the anterior cingulate cortex and infralimbic cortex play in these behavioral processes. We suggest that further work that directly compares neural mechanisms during stress contagion and stress buffering will be important for identifying what appear to be distinct but overlapping circuits mediating these processes.

Citing Articles

Pair bond quality influences social conditioned place preference expression, passive coping behavior, and central oxytocin receptor expression following partner loss in male prairie voles.

Vitale E, Tbaba A, Sanchez S, Hale L, Kenkel W, Johnson M Soc Neurosci. 2024; 19(4):273-286.

PMID: 39577457 PMC: 11654629. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2024.2428598.


Unraveling sex differences in maternal and paternal care impacts on social behaviors and neurobiological responses to early-life adversity.

Walker S, Glasper E Front Neuroendocrinol. 2024; 76:101162.

PMID: 39561882 PMC: 11811932. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2024.101162.


Effects of short-term isolation on social behaviors in prairie voles.

Madrid J, Pranic N, Chu S, Bergstrom J, Singh R, Rabinovich J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313172.

PMID: 39527561 PMC: 11554233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313172.


Possible relations between emotional contagion and social buffering.

Reimert I, Bolhuis J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25944.

PMID: 39472724 PMC: 11522516. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77394-7.


Contagion of depression: a double-edged sword.

Huang C, Hu T, Zheng H, Wu Y, Li J, Wang Y Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):396.

PMID: 39349463 PMC: 11443097. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03124-2.


References
1.
Engert V, Linz R, Grant J . Embodied stress: The physiological resonance of psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018; 105:138-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.221. View

2.
Stoop R . Neuromodulation by oxytocin and vasopressin. Neuron. 2012; 76(1):142-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.025. View

3.
Huber D, Veinante P, Stoop R . Vasopressin and oxytocin excite distinct neuronal populations in the central amygdala. Science. 2005; 308(5719):245-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1105636. View

4.
Bartz J, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner K . Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(7):301-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002. View

5.
Rogers-Carter M, Djerdjaj A, Culp A, Elbaz J, Christianson J . Familiarity modulates social approach toward stressed conspecifics in female rats. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0200971. PMC: 6168124. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200971. View