» Articles » PMID: 33465259

Assessing the Toxicity of Individual Aromatic Compounds and Mixtures to American Lobster (Homarus Americanus) Larvae Using a Passive Dosing System

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 19
PMID 33465259
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aquatic exposures to aromatic compounds (ACs) may be important contributors to biological effects of oil spills. The present study examined the acute toxicity of 11 ACs and 3 binary AC mixtures on stage 1 American lobster larvae using a passive dosing test design. The ACs investigated covered a range of classes and log octanol-water partition coefficient values (K ; 2.5-5.5). Silicone O-rings were used to partition ACs into seawater and maintain stable exposures. Exposed lobster larvae were assessed for mobility and survival at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Fluorometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry measurements confirmed well-defined substance exposures. Expressing lethality in terms of chemical activities yielded values between 0.01 and 0.1, consistent with a baseline mode of action. Analysis of time-dependent median lethal/effect concentration (L/EC50) values were used to determine incipient values. An expected linear relationship between the incipient log L/EC50 and log K was fit to the empirical toxicity data to derive critical target lipid body burdens for immobilization and lethality endpoints. These values indicate that American lobster larvae fall on the sensitive end of the acute species sensitivity distribution. We used AC toxicity data to successfully predict toxicity of binary mixtures assuming additive toxicity. The observed time-dependent toxicity was inversely related to log K and occurred more quickly than reported previously. The results contribute to improving models for predicting oil spill impacts on American lobster larvae populations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1379-1388. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Citing Articles

Recommendations for advancing media preparation methods used to assess aquatic hazards of oils and spill response agents.

Parkerton T, Boufadel M, Nordtug T, Mitchelmore C, Colvin K, Wetzel D Aquat Toxicol. 2023; 259:106518.

PMID: 37030101 PMC: 10519191. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106518.


Dosing Methods to Enable Cell-Based In Vitro Testing of Complex Substances: A Case Study with a PAH Mixture.

Cordova A, Ford L, Valdiviezo A, Roman-Hubers A, McDonald T, Chiu W Toxics. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36668745 PMC: 9866728. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11010019.

References
1.
Knap A, Turner N, Bera G, Renegar D, Frank T, Sericano J . Short-term toxicity of 1-methylnaphthalene to Americamysis bahia and 5 deep-sea crustaceans. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017; 36(12):3415-3423. DOI: 10.1002/etc.3926. View

2.
Incardona J . Molecular Mechanisms of Crude Oil Developmental Toxicity in Fish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017; 73(1):19-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-017-0381-1. View

3.
Kipka U, Di Toro D . Technical basis for polar and nonpolar narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. III. A polyparameter model for target lipid partitioning. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009; 28(7):1429-38. DOI: 10.1897/08-364.1. View

4.
Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig J, Gerhard D . Dose-Response Analysis Using R. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0146021. PMC: 4696819. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021. View

5.
Di Toro D, McGrath J, Stubblefield W . Predicting the toxicity of neat and weathered crude oil: toxic potential and the toxicity of saturated mixtures. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007; 26(1):24-36. DOI: 10.1897/06174r.1. View