» Articles » PMID: 33461756

Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes in 1,136 Singleton Pregnancies Conceived After Programmed Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Compared with Natural Cycle FET

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2021 Jan 19
PMID 33461756
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies differ after different frozen embryo transfer (FET) protocols.

Design: Register-based cohort study.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): All singleton deliveries after assisted reproductive technology in Denmark from 2006 to 2014. Data consisted of 1,136 deliveries after frozen in vitro fertilization. Frozen embryo transfer cycles were grouped by type of FET protocol: programmed FET (n = 357); modified natural cycle FET (n = 611); and true natural cycle FET (n = 168).

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Obstetric outcomes (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, placenta previa, placental abruption, induction of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section) and perinatal outcomes (post-term birth, preterm birth, birth weight, small for gestational age, large for gestational age).

Result(s): The risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section was significantly higher after programmed FET compared with natural cycle FET (modified natural cycle FET and true natural cycle FET). A higher risk of birth weight > 4,500 g was observed in the programmed FET group compared with natural cycle FET.

Conclusion(s): This study shows that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are adversely affected in programmed FET cycles. Hence, when possible, an endometrial preparation with the creation of a corpus luteum should be considered. Properly sized randomized controlled trials of FET in programmed cycle versus natural cycle including perinatal outcomes are warranted in the future.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN11780826.

Citing Articles

No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer.

Zhang W, Wu S, Ren B, Jia R, Zhang W, Wang B Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1458527.

PMID: 39882266 PMC: 11774695. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1458527.


Singleton term pregnancies resulting from frozen-thawed embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles increase the risk of aberrant placentation, including velamentous umbilical cord insertion.

Furuya S, Yamaguchi T, Ishikawa I, Ishikawa M, Kawanami R, Kasano S Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39838157 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07935-6.


Fresh vs. frozen: pregnancy outcomes and treatment efficacy between fresh embryo transfer vs. untested freeze-all cycles.

Pavlovic Z, Smotrich G, New E, Jahandideh S, Devine K, Imudia A F S Rep. 2025; 5(4):369-377.

PMID: 39781068 PMC: 11705573. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.09.003.


Preterm birth in assisted reproduction: the mediating role of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Petersen S, Asvold B, Lawlor D, Pinborg A, Spangmose A, Romundstad L Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(1):167-177.

PMID: 39656847 PMC: 11700897. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae261.


Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes in 44,118 Singleton Pregnancies: Endometrial Preparation Methods for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer.

Yu E, Lee H, Lee S, Kim J, Kim S, Joo J J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(45):e282.

PMID: 39592126 PMC: 11596472. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e282.