» Articles » PMID: 33457610

Psychometric Properties of the Filipino Version of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS): A Cross-Cultural Validation Study

Overview
Journal J Patient Exp
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Jan 18
PMID 33457610
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Albeit the importance of patient experience, most questionnaires are only available in English. To understand the hospital experience of Filipino patients, a psychometrically sound instrument in Filipino is warranted. This study culturally adapted and validated the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) into Filipino. A 5-step cross-cultural validation process was conducted. Forward translation, back-translation, and panel reconciliation involved 7 language experts. Pretesting included content validation and pretesting of the Filipino HCAHPS, while field testing involved 64 purposively selected hospitalized patients who completed a 4-part survey from July to December 2018. Content, linguistic, and conceptual equivalence and internal consistency were statistically appraised. Content validation yielded a scale content validity index/average of 1.00. Comparative analysis and Bland-Altman plots indicated good linguistic equivalence. All correlation coefficients were ≥.30, denoting good conceptual equivalence. Cronbach's α for both versions of HCAHPS were ≥0.80, suggestive of good internal consistency. The Filipino HCAHPS is a psychometrically sound and culturally appropriate tool to measure patient experience among Filipinos. This understanding can be utilized for quality improvements on both practice and policy levels.

Citing Articles

Raising the bar for patient experience during care transitions in Canada: A repeated cross-sectional survey evaluating a patient-oriented discharge summary at Ontario hospitals.

Okrainec K, Chaput A, Rac V, Tomlinson G, Matelski J, Robson M PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0268418.

PMID: 36194600 PMC: 9531793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268418.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Coulter A, Jenkinson C . European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. Eur J Public Health. 2005; 15(4):355-60. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cki004. View

3.
Westbrook K, Babakus E, Grant C . Measuring patient-perceived hospital service quality: validity and managerial usefulness of HCAHPS scales. Health Mark Q. 2014; 31(2):97-114. DOI: 10.1080/07359683.2014.907114. View

4.
Greaves F, Laverty A, Millett C . Friends and family test results only moderately associated with conventional measures of hospital quality. BMJ. 2013; 347:f4986. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f4986. View

5.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View