» Articles » PMID: 33455605

Predictors of the Importance of Everyday Preferences for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Geriatrics
Psychiatry
Date 2021 Jan 18
PMID 33455605
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Among older people with cognitive impairment and mild dementia, relatively little is known about the factors that predict preferences for everyday living activities and experiences and that influence the relative importance of those activities and experiences.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Participants were recruited from the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (MADRC) Clinical Core longitudinal cohort.

Participants: The sample included 62 community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment (Clinical Dementia Rating global score ≥ 0.5).

Measurements: We used the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) to assess preferences for activities and lifestyle experiences among persons with cognitive impairment. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in the mean ratings of importance for four domains of the PELI ("autonomous choice," "social engagement," "personal growth," and "keeping a routine"). Multiple regression models were used to relate predictors, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, to importance ratings for each domain.

Results: Significant differences were noted in the mean importance ratings of the preferences domains: "social engagement" preferences were rated as most important, followed by "autonomous choice," "personal growth," and "keeping a routine." For the "social engagement" preferences domain, female sex was significantly associated with higher importance of "social engagement," while depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale-15 scores) were significantly associated with lower importance.

Conclusions: This study adds novel insight into the everyday preferences of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment and highlights the impact of a number of factors, particularly level of depression, on how important various everyday experiences are perceived.

Citing Articles

Nursing Home Resident Preferences for Daily Care and Activities: A Latent Class Analysis of National Data.

Duan Y, Ng W, Bowblis J, Akosionu O, Shippee T Gerontologist. 2023; 64(2).

PMID: 37432373 PMC: 10825845. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad089.


Longitudinal differences in everyday preferences: Comparisons between people with cognitive impairment and their care partners.

Wilkins J, Locascio J, Gunther J, Gomez-Isla T, Hyman B, Blacker D Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021; 37(1).

PMID: 34498322 PMC: 8901800. DOI: 10.1002/gps.5620.


Moving toward more person-centered dementia care.

Gerlach L, Kales H Int Psychogeriatr. 2021; 34(3):227-228.

PMID: 33818345 PMC: 8490490. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610221000478.

References
1.
. 2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; . DOI: 10.1002/alz.12068. View

2.
van den Dungen P, van Kuijk L, van Marwijk H, van der Wouden J, Moll van Charante E, van der Horst H . Preferences regarding disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014; 26(10):1603-1618. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610214000969. View

3.
Vilar R, Liu J, Gouveia V . Age and gender differences in human values: A 20-nation study. Psychol Aging. 2020; 35(3):345-356. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000448. View

4.
Geshell L, Kwak J, Radhakrishnan K . Perspectives and Experiences of Persons With Dementia With Advance Care Planning: An Integrative Literature Review. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019; 32(5):231-245. DOI: 10.1177/0891988719853040. View

5.
Van Haitsma K, Curyto K, Spector A, Towsley G, Kleban M, Carpenter B . The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders. Gerontologist. 2012; 53(4):582-95. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gns102. View