» Articles » PMID: 33452057

Preventing First Births Among Adolescents in Mexico City's Public Abortion Programme

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 16
PMID 33452057
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We examined parity and age among women seeking an abortion in Mexico City's public first-trimester abortion programme, Interrupcion Legal de Embarazo (ILE). We hypothesised that younger women, especially students, used abortion to prevent first births while older women used abortion to limit births.

Methods: We used clinical data from a sample of 47 462 women who had an abortion between 2007 and 2016 and classified them as nulliparous or parous according to previous births prior to the abortion. We used logistic regression to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with using abortion to prevent a first birth (nulliparous) versus limiting births (parous) and calculated absolute multivariable predicted probabilities.

Results: Overall, 41% of abortions were in nulliparous women seeking to prevent a first birth, and 59% were in women who already had one or more children. The adjusted probability of using abortion to prevent a first birth was 80.4% (95% CI 78.3 to 82.4) for women aged 12-17 years and 54.3% (95% CI 51.6 to 57.0) for women aged 18-24 years. Adolescents (aged 12-17 years) who were employed or students had nearly 90% adjusted probability of using abortion to prevent a first birth (employed 87.8%, 95% CI 82.9 to 92.8; students 88.5%, 95% CI 82.9 to 94.1). At all ages, employed women and students had higher probabilities of using abortion to prevent a first birth compared with unemployed women and women who work in the home.

Conclusion: Legal first-trimester abortion services in Mexico can help prevent first births in adolescents, especially students.

Citing Articles

Travelling for abortion services in Mexico 2016-2019: community-level contexts of Mexico City public abortion clients.

Jacobson L, Saavedra-Avendano B, Fuentes-Rivera E, Schiavon R, Darney B BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021; 48(e1):e81-e87.

PMID: 34321256 PMC: 8685658. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201079.

References
1.
Klepinger D, Lundberg S, Plotnick R . Adolescent fertility and the educational attainment of young women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995; 27(1):23-8. View

2.
Fall C, Sachdev H, Osmond C, Restrepo-Mendez M, Victora C, Martorell R . Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration). Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3(7):e366-77. PMC: 4547329. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00038-8. View

3.
Darney B, Fuentes-Rivera E, Saavedra-Avendano B, Sanhueza-Smith P, Schiavon R . Contraceptive Receipt Among First-Trimester Abortion Clients and Postpartum Women in Urban Mexico. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 46(Suppl 1):35-43. DOI: 10.1363/46e0720. View

4.
Kung S, Saavedra-Avendano B, Velez E, Pineros M, Metcalfe G, Darney B . Capturing compassion: A survey of Mexican Catholics assessing abortion support by reason for abortion and degree of Catholicism. Contraception. 2018; 98(6):504-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.008. View

5.
Kung S, Darney B, Saavedra-Avendano B, Lohr P, Gil L . Access to abortion under the heath exception: a comparative analysis in three countries. Reprod Health. 2018; 15(1):107. PMC: 5998589. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0548-x. View