» Articles » PMID: 33451345

A Phase Ib/II Study of Xentuzumab, an IGF-neutralising Antibody, Combined with Exemestane and Everolimus in Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Locally Advanced/metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract

Background: Xentuzumab-a humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody-binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting their growth-promoting signalling and suppressing AKT activation by everolimus. This phase Ib/II exploratory trial evaluated xentuzumab plus everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive, locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC).

Methods: Patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative LA/MBC resistant to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were enrolled. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane were determined in phase I (single-arm, dose-escalation). In phase II (open-label), patients were randomised 1:1 to the RP2D of xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane or everolimus/exemestane alone. Randomisation was stratified by the presence of visceral metastases. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: MTD was determined as xentuzumab 1000 mg weekly plus everolimus 10 mg/day and exemestane 25 mg/day. A total of 140 patients were enrolled in phase II (70 to each arm). Further recruitment was stopped following an unfavourable benefit-risk assessment by the internal Data Monitoring Committee appointed by the sponsor. Xentuzumab was discontinued; patients could receive everolimus/exemestane if clinically indicated. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI 3.3-not calculable) in the xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane group and 5.6 months (3.7-9.1) in the everolimus/exemestane group (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.57-1.65; P = 0.9057). In a pre-specified subgroup of patients without visceral metastases at screening, xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane showed evidence of PFS benefit versus everolimus/exemestane (hazard ratio 0.21 [0.05-0.98]; P = 0.0293). Most common any-cause adverse events in phase II were diarrhoea (29 [41.4%] in the xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane group versus 20 [29.0%] in the everolimus/exemestane group), mucosal inflammation (27 [38.6%] versus 21 [30.4%]), stomatitis (24 [34.3%] versus 24 [34.8%]), and asthenia (21 [30.0%] versus 24 [34.8%]).

Conclusions: Addition of xentuzumab to everolimus/exemestane did not improve PFS in the overall population, leading to early discontinuation of the trial. Evidence of PFS benefit was observed in patients without visceral metastases when treated with xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane, leading to initiation of the phase II XENERA™-1 trial (NCT03659136).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02123823 . Prospectively registered, 8 March 2013.

Citing Articles

The role of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer and possibilities of moving forward-a narrative review.

Rubovszky G Ann Transl Med. 2024; 12(4):68.

PMID: 39118946 PMC: 11304436. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1583.


PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling transduction pathway and targeted therapies in cancer.

Glaviano A, Foo A, Lam H, Yap K, Jacot W, Jones R Mol Cancer. 2023; 22(1):138.

PMID: 37596643 PMC: 10436543. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01827-6.


XENERA-1: a randomised double-blind Phase II trial of xentuzumab in combination with everolimus and exemestane versus everolimus and exemestane in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and non-visceral disease.

Schmid P, Cortes J, Joaquim A, Martinez Janez N, Morales S, Diaz-Redondo T Breast Cancer Res. 2023; 25(1):67.

PMID: 37308971 PMC: 10258741. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01649-w.


Emerging Intrinsic Therapeutic Targets for Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Li J, Goh E, He J, Li Y, Fan Z, Yu Z Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37237509 PMC: 10215321. DOI: 10.3390/biology12050697.


Preclinical evaluation of Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) and Insulin Receptor (IR) as a therapeutic targets in triple negative breast cancer.

Roche S, Gaule P, Winrow D, Mukherjee N, ONeill F, Conlon N PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282512.

PMID: 36920947 PMC: 10016661. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282512.


References
1.
LeBedis C, Chen K, Fallavollita L, Boutros T, Brodt P . Peripheral lymph node stromal cells can promote growth and tumorigenicity of breast carcinoma cells through the release of IGF-I and EGF. Int J Cancer. 2002; 100(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10481. View

2.
Rieunier G, Wu X, Macaulay V, Lee A, Weyer-Czernilofsky U, Bogenrieder T . Bad to the Bone: The Role of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis in Osseous Metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(12):3479-3485. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2697. View

3.
Robinson D, Wu Y, Vats P, Su F, Lonigro R, Cao X . Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(12):1446-51. PMC: 4009946. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2823. View

4.
Piccart M, Hortobagyi G, Campone M, Pritchard K, Lebrun F, Ito Y . Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2†. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(12):2357-2362. PMC: 6267855. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu456. View

5.
Hiraga T, Myoui A, Hashimoto N, Sasaki A, Hata K, Morita Y . Bone-derived IGF mediates crosstalk between bone and breast cancer cells in bony metastases. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(16):4238-49. PMC: 3438359. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3061. View