» Articles » PMID: 33444110

The Case for Biocalculus: Improving Student Understanding of the Utility Value of Mathematics to Biology and Affect Toward Mathematics

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 14
PMID 33444110
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The next generation of life science professionals will require far more quantitative skills than prior generations. Calculus is important for understanding dynamical systems in biology and, therefore, is often a required course for life science students. However, many life science students do not understand the utility value of mathematics to biology. Therefore, according to expectancy-value theory, life science students may experience lower motivation, which can impact their performance in a calculus course. This study examines how two different biocalculus courses, which integrated calculus and biological concepts and successfully halved the rates of students earning a D, F, or withdrawing (DFW), affected life science students' utility value, interest, and overall attitudes toward mathematics. Using pre and post surveys, we found that students' interest in mathematics increased by the end of the semester, and they demonstrated a more sophisticated understanding of how mathematics is used in biology. Students whose attitudes toward mathematics improved primarily attributed these changes to a better understanding of the utility of mathematics to biology, feelings of competence in mathematics, or rapport with the instructor. Thus, communicating the utility value of mathematics to biology through integrated mathematics-biology courses can contribute to improved attitudes toward mathematics that can impact students' motivation and performance.

Citing Articles

Biology Students' Math and Computer Science Task Values Are Closely Linked.

Caughman A, Weigel E CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022; 21(3):ar43.

PMID: 35759628 PMC: 9582834. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-07-0180.


Reimagining the Introductory Math Curriculum for Life Sciences Students.

OLeary E, Sayson H, Shapiro C, Garfinkel A, Conley W, Levis-Fitzgerald M CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021; 20(4):ar62.

PMID: 34846919 PMC: 8715777. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-11-0252.

References
1.
Hulleman C, Harackiewicz J . Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science. 2009; 326(5958):1410-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1177067. View

2.
Theobald E . Students Are Rarely Independent: When, Why, and How to Use Random Effects in Discipline-Based Education Research. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018; 17(3):rm2. PMC: 6234830. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0280. View

3.
Xu S, Lorber M . Interrater agreement statistics with skewed data: evaluation of alternatives to Cohen's kappa. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014; 82(6):1219-27. DOI: 10.1037/a0037489. View

4.
Canning E, Harackiewicz J, Priniski S, Hecht C, Tibbetts Y, Hyde J . Improving Performance and Retention in Introductory Biology with a Utility-Value Intervention. J Educ Psychol. 2018; 110(6):834-849. PMC: 6168083. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000244. View

5.
Thompson K, Nelson K, Marbach-Ad G, Keller M, Fagan W . Online interactive teaching modules enhance quantitative proficiency of introductory biology students. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010; 9(3):277-83. PMC: 2931674. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-03-0028. View