» Articles » PMID: 33442852

A Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Thinning and Drilling on Laser-assisted Hatching

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Jan 14
PMID 33442852
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The 1410 patients who met the inclusion criteria were further categorized into two groups based on the hatching procedure used: the thinning laser-assisted hatching group (T-LAH, 716 patients), and the drilling laser-assisted hatching group (D-LAH, 694 patients). The baseline characteristics of the patients were consistent between the two groups. However, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group (32.73% vs. 29.09%, P < 0.01, and 50.98% vs. 43.95%, P < 0.01). The proportion of live birth was also higher in the T-LAH group, but the difference was insignificant (39.11% vs. 36.89%, P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in rates of miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, preterm births, and congenital disabilities between the two groups. Nonetheless, significantly higher rates of implantation and pregnancy were reported in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group among patients aged <35 years, patients with at least one previously failed cycle, and patients with an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. T-LAH is superior to D-LAH in improving clinical implantation and pregnancy outcomes in D4 FET, particularly in patients aged <35 years with at least one previously failed cycle or an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for clinical individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with infertility.

Citing Articles

Impact of Mycotoxin Metabolites Deepoxy-Deoxynivalenol and Beta-Zearalenol on Bovine Preimplantation Embryo Development in the Presence of Acetonitrile.

Gacnikar J, Mrkun J, Babic J, Sternisa M, Zakosek Pipan M Vet Sci. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38922014 PMC: 11209286. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11060267.


Unlocking the Potential of Assisted Hatching in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Narrative Review.

Deotalu S, More A, Karadbhajne P, Chaudhari K Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60736.

PMID: 38903279 PMC: 11187726. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60736.


Two laser-assisted hatching methods of embryos in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Gao M, Wu Y, Hu Z, Tang L, Li M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):300.

PMID: 38649878 PMC: 11034172. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06380-8.


The Current Practice of Assisted Hatching for Embryos in Fertility Centres: a General Survey.

Liu Y, Jones C, Coward K Reprod Sci. 2022; 29(9):2664-2673.

PMID: 35411451 PMC: 9444829. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00931-0.

References
1.
Ferre M, Amati-Bonneau P, Moriniere C, Ferre-LHotellier V, Lemerle S, Przyrowski D . Are zona pellucida genes involved in recurrent oocyte lysis observed during in vitro fertilization?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013; 31(2):221-7. PMC: 3933593. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0141-8. View

2.
Sun S, Choi J, Son J, Joo J, Ko G, Lee K . The effect of long zona dissection using ICSI pipettes for mechanical assisted hatching in vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012; 29(12):1431-4. PMC: 3528865. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9872-1. View

3.
Kirienko K, Apryshko V, Naumova A, Kharitonova M, Klepukov A, Bolt A . Mechanical zona pellucida removal of vitrified-warmed human blastocysts does not affect the clinical outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39(5):745-749. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.003. View

4.
Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer M . Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044. View

5.
Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, Mercan R, Mumcu A, Isiklar A . A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(5):1239-43. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1239. View