» Articles » PMID: 33441674

Dogs' Insensitivity to Scaffolding Behaviour in an A-not-B Task Provides Support for the Theory of Natural Pedagogy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jan 14
PMID 33441674
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Executive function plays a critical role in regulating behaviour. Behaviour which directs attention towards the correct solution leads to increased executive function performance in children, but it is unknown how other animals respond to such scaffolding behaviour. Dogs were presented with an A-not-B detour task. After learning to go through gap A to obtain the reward, the barrier was reversed, and the dogs had to inhibit their learned response and enter through gap B on the opposite side. Failure to do so is known as the perseveration error. In test trials, dogs taking part in one of two scaffolding conditions, a pointing condition, where the experimenter pointed to the new gap, and a demonstration condition, where the experimenter demonstrated the new route, were no less likely to commit the perseveration error than dogs in a control condition with no scaffolding behaviour. Dogs' lack of responsiveness to scaffolding behaviour provides little support for suggestions that simple social learning mechanisms explains scaffolding behaviour in humans. Instead, our results suggest that the theory of natural pedagogy extends to the development of executive function in humans. This suggests that human children's predisposition to interpret ostensive-communicative cues as informative may be an innate, species-specific adaptation.

Citing Articles

Evolution and function of neurocognitive systems in non-human animals.

Frasnelli E Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23487.

PMID: 34880266 PMC: 8654867. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02736-8.

References
1.
Diamond A . Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 64:135-68. PMC: 4084861. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. View

2.
Miyake A, Friedman N . The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012; 21(1):8-14. PMC: 3388901. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411429458. View

3.
Miller E, Cohen J . An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24:167-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167. View

4.
Koechlin E, Summerfield C . An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(6):229-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.005. View

5.
Borella E, Carretti B, Pelegrina S . The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. J Learn Disabil. 2010; 43(6):541-52. DOI: 10.1177/0022219410371676. View