» Articles » PMID: 33441189

An Evaluation of Service User Experience, Clinical Outcomes and Service Use Associated with Urgent Care Services That Utilise Telephone-based Digital Triage: a Systematic Review Protocol

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jan 14
PMID 33441189
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Telephone-based digital triage is widely used by services that provide urgent care. This involves a call handler or clinician using a digital triage tool to generate algorithm-based care advice, based on a patient's symptoms. Advice typically takes the form of signposting within defined levels of urgency to specific services or self-care advice. Despite wide adoption, there is limited evaluation of its impact on service user experience, service use and clinical outcomes; no previous systematic reviews have focussed on services that utilise digital triage, and its impact on these outcome areas within urgent care. This review aims to address this need, particularly now that telephone-based digital triage is well established in healthcare delivery.

Methods: Studies assessing the impact of telephone-based digital triage on service user experience, health care service use and clinical outcomes will be identified through searches conducted in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Scopus. Search terms using words relating to digital triage and urgent care settings (excluding in-hours general practice) will be used. The review will include all original study types including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies; studies published in the last 20 years and studies published in English. Quality assessment of studies will be conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT); a narrative synthesis approach will be used to analyse and summarise findings.

Discussion: This is the first systematic review to evaluate service user experience, service use and clinical outcomes related to the use of telephone-based digital triage in urgent care settings. It will evaluate evidence from studies of wide-ranging designs. The narrative synthesis approach will enable the integration of findings to provide new insights on service delivery. Models of urgent care continue to evolve rapidly, with the emergence of self-triage tools and national help lines. Findings from this review will be presented in a practical format that can feed into the design of digital triage tools, future service design and healthcare policy.

Systematic Review Registration: This systematic review is registered on the international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178500 ).

Citing Articles

Building a performance measurement framework for telephone triage services in Finland: a consensus-making study based on nominal group technique.

Vainio H, Soininen L, Torkki P Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):69.

PMID: 39138499 PMC: 11321161. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01243-9.


Identifying performance indicators to measure overall performance of telephone triage - a scoping review.

Vainio H, Soininen L, Castren M, Torkki P Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023; 42(1):38-50.

PMID: 38078730 PMC: 10851803. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2283188.


Compliance and patient satisfaction with treatment settings recommended by the medical on-call service 116117 in Germany using computer-assisted structured initial assessment: a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the demand intervention.

Schafer I, Menzel A, Herrmann T, Willms G, Oltrogge J, Luhmann D BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e070475.

PMID: 37160385 PMC: 10173980. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070475.


Service use, clinical outcomes and user experience associated with urgent care services that use telephone-based digital triage: a systematic review.

Sexton V, Dale J, Bryce C, Barry J, Sellers E, Atherton H BMJ Open. 2022; 12(1):e051569.

PMID: 34980613 PMC: 8724705. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051569.

References
1.
McKenzie R, Williamson M, Roberts R . Who uses the 'after hours GP helpline'? A profile of users of an after-hours primary care helpline. Aust Fam Physician. 2016; 45(5):313-8. View

2.
Carrasqueiro S, Oliveira M, Encarnacao P . Evaluation of telephone triage and advice services: a systematic review on methods, metrics and results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169:407-11. View

3.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

4.
Hawkes N . Array of out-of-hours and emergency services is confusing to public, says NHS chief. BMJ. 2014; 349:g7186. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7186. View

5.
McAteer A, Hannaford P, Heaney D, Ritchie L, Elliott A . Investigating the public's use of Scotland's primary care telephone advice service (NHS 24): a population-based cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(646):e337-46. PMC: 4838446. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684409. View