» Articles » PMID: 33440107

Pediatric Weight Estimation: Validation of the PAWPER XL Tape and the PAWPER XL Tape Mid-arm Circumference Method in a South African Hospital

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2021 Jan 13
PMID 33440107
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to prospectively compare the performance of the Broselow tape, Mercy method, pediatric advanced weight prediction in the emergency room extra-long (PAWPER XL) tape, and PAWPER XL mid-arm circumference (MAC) method in estimating the weight of children from a low-income setting. The secondary aim was to analyze the time taken to perform each method.

Methods: This analyzed a convenience study sample of 300 children aged 0 to 18 years at the Baragwanath Hospital in South Africa. Weight estimations were obtained using each of the weight estimation systems on each child. These weight estimations were then compared against the actual weight to determine bias, precision, and accuracy of the estimation methods.

Results: The PAWPER XL tape and PAWPER XL-MAC methods performed the best and provided estimated weights within 10% of the actual weight in 62.7% and 67.3% of cases, respectively, followed by the Mercy method (56.5%) and Broselow tape (43.9%). The use of MAC improved the accuracy of estimation, especially in heavier and taller children. The median times taken to perform measurements using the Broselow tape, Mercy method, PAWPER XL tape, and PAWPER XL-MAC method were 11.3 seconds, 34.7 seconds, 9.3 seconds, and 33.9 seconds respectively.

Conclusion: The PAWPER XL tape and PAWPER XL-MAC methods were the most accurate methods of estimating weight in this group of children. These methods may be considered in preference to the Broselow tape or the Mercy method for emergency weight estimation in low socioeconomic status populations.

Citing Articles

A validation of newly developed weight estimating tape for Korean pediatric patients.

Choi S, Nah S, Kim S, Seong E, Kim S, Han S PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271109.

PMID: 35797338 PMC: 9262219. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271109.

References
1.
Batmanabane G, Jena P, Dikshit R, Abdel-Rahman S . Using the Mercy Method for Weight Estimation in Indian Children. Glob Pediatr Health. 2016; 2:2333794X14566625. PMC: 4784605. DOI: 10.1177/2333794X14566625. View

2.
Wells M, Goldstein L, Bentley A . The Use of Body Habitus Reference Images Improves the Ability of Novices to Accurately Estimate Children's Weight Using the PAWPER XL Tape System. J Emerg Med. 2017; 54(2):165-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.10.009. View

3.
Wells M . A validation of the PAWPER XL-MAC tape for total body weight estimation in preschool children from low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210332. PMC: 6322773. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210332. View

4.
Cattermole G, Leung P, Graham C, Rainer T . Too tall for the tape: the weight of schoolchildren who do not fit the Broselow tape. Emerg Med J. 2013; 31(7):541-544. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202325. View

5.
Wells M, Goldstein L, Bentley A . Development and validation of a method to estimate body weight in critically ill children using length and mid-arm circumference measurements: The PAWPER XL-MAC system. S Afr Med J. 2017; 107(11):1015-1021. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i11.12505. View