» Articles » PMID: 33439727

Overall Survival With Second-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Versus Propensity-Adjusted Real-World Data

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 13
PMID 33439727
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare and characterize overall survival (OS) differences between clinical trial data from the KEYNOTE-010 trial and real-world data (RWD) from the Flatiron Health database in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received second-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Methods: Clinical trial data were from the randomized phase II/III KEYNOTE-010 trial that enrolled patients from August 28, 2013, to February 27, 2015. At data cutoff for KEYNOTE-010, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab patients was 11.2 months. RWD were from Flatiron Health advanced NSCLC database and included patients who initiated second-line pembrolizumab from January 26, 2015, to February 28, 2019. At data cutoff for Flatiron, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab-treated patients was 6.1 months. Clinical trial data from KEYNOTE-010 and RWD from Flatiron were analyzed without adjustment, with propensity adjustment, and filtered per the main KEYNOTE-010 eligibility criteria (EC) of histologically/cytologically confirmed PD-L1-positive NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, no prior therapy with docetaxel for NSCLC, and laboratory values indicative of adequate organ function in addition to prior line of therapy requirements.

Results: Among 243 patients from KEYNOTE-010 and 782 from Flatiron, median age was 63 68 years, and 64% 54% were male, respectively. OS data from KEYNOTE-010 and Flatiron were similar without any adjustment (n = 782; hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15) and after both filtering and propensity adjustment (n = 221; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.34).

Conclusion: Without any adjustment, as well as after applying similar EC and appropriate statistical methods, RWD demonstrated similar effectiveness for pembrolizumab in second-line NSCLC as observed in randomized clinical trials.

Citing Articles

A comparative study of clinical trial and real-world data in patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Kurki S, Halla-Aho V, Haussmann M, Lahdesmaki H, Leinonen J, Koskinen M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1731.

PMID: 38243002 PMC: 10798981. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51938-3.


Lung adenocarcinoma in a patient with Lynch syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Hodges A, Sun K, Sheu T, Bernicker E Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1193503.

PMID: 37901336 PMC: 10613082. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193503.


Comparative Analysis of First-Line FOLFOX Treatment With and Without Anti-VEGF Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Real-World Data Study.

Brenner R, Amar-Farkash S, Klein-Brill A, Rosenberg-Katz K, Aran D Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231202470.

PMID: 37724508 PMC: 10510351. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231202470.


Real-World Data Analysis of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for NSCLC Using Japanese Postmarketing All-Case Surveillance Data.

Terai H, Soejima K, Shimokawa A, Horinouchi H, Shimizu J, Hase T JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022; 3(11):100404.

PMID: 36275911 PMC: 9579417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100404.


Oncology Drug Effectiveness from Electronic Health Record Data Calibrated Against RCT Evidence: The PARSIFAL Trial Emulation.

Merola D, Young J, Schrag D, Lin K, Robert N, Schneeweiss S Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 14:1135-1144.

PMID: 36246306 PMC: 9563733. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S373291.