» Articles » PMID: 33438178

Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging in Evaluation of Aortic Stiffness: A Proof-of-concept Study

Overview
Journal Cardiol J
Date 2021 Jan 13
PMID 33438178
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties.

Methods: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta - diameter ≥ 40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS.

Results: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = -0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21-17.13).

Conclusions: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.

Citing Articles

Impact of renin-angiotensin system targeted therapy on aortic elastic properties assessed by computed tomography.

Mileva N, Panayotov P, Hristova I, Koleva G, Georgieva D, Ivanova R Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 55:101562.

PMID: 39649025 PMC: 11625146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101562.

References
1.
Belz G . Elastic properties and Windkessel function of the human aorta. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995; 9(1):73-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF00877747. View

2.
Redheuil A, Yu W, Wu C, Mousseaux E, De Cesare A, Yan R . Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension. 2010; 55(2):319-26. PMC: 3035625. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.141275. View

3.
Wei H, Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde M, Legalery P, Caulfield F . The value of intravascular ultrasound imaging in diagnosis of aortic penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. EuroIntervention. 2009; 1(4):432-7. View

4.
Weintraub A, Schwartz S, Pandian N, Katz S, Kwon O, Millan V . Evaluation of acute aortic dissection by intravascular ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 1990; 323(22):1566-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199011293232215. View

5.
Mattace-Raso F, van der Cammen T, Hofman A, van Popele N, Bos M, Schalekamp M . Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2006; 113(5):657-63. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.555235. View