» Articles » PMID: 33435249

The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jan 13
PMID 33435249
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper presents a brief overview of the recent literature on adaptive design of clinical trials from a Bayesian perspective for statistically not so sophisticated readers. Adaptive designs are attracting a keen interest in several disciplines, from a theoretical viewpoint and also-potentially-from a practical one, and Bayesian adaptive designs, in particular, have raised high expectations in clinical trials. The main conceptual tools are highlighted here, with a mention of several trial designs proposed in the literature that use these methods, including some of the registered Bayesian adaptive trials to this date. This review aims at complementing the existing ones on this topic, pointing at further interesting reading material.

Citing Articles

Establishment of a machine learning model for predicting splenic hilar lymph node metastasis.

Ishizu K, Takahashi S, Kouno N, Takasawa K, Takeda K, Matsui K NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):93.

PMID: 39934302 PMC: 11814149. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01480-x.


A Bayesian adaptive feasibility design for rare diseases.

Churipuy M, Golchi S, Hudson M, Hoa S Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024; 42:101392.

PMID: 39618478 PMC: 11605459. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101392.


Adaptive designs in clinical trials: a systematic review-part I.

Ben-Eltriki M, Rafiq A, Paul A, Prabhu D, Afolabi M, Baslhaw R BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):229.

PMID: 39367313 PMC: 11451232. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02272-9.


Couples-based health behavior change interventions: A relationship science perspective on the unique opportunities and challenges to improve dyadic health.

Gouin J, Dymarski M Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2024; 19:100250.

PMID: 39155951 PMC: 11326928. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2024.100250.


Improving Miscarriage Prevention Research: a survey exploring the expectations of service users and stakeholders (IMPRESS) - a study protocol for a UK-based survey.

Black N, Quenby S, Odendaal J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e085929.

PMID: 39067886 PMC: 11284882. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085929.


References
1.
Thall P, Inoue L, Martin T . Adaptive decision making in a lymphocyte infusion trial. Biometrics. 2002; 58(3):560-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00560.x. View

2.
Rugo H, Olopade O, DeMichele A, Yau C, J van t Veer L, Buxton M . Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib-Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(1):23-34. PMC: 5259561. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513749. View

3.
Zhong W, Koopmeiners J, Carlin B . A two-stage Bayesian design with sample size reestimation and subgroup analysis for phase II binary response trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013; 36(2):587-96. PMC: 3757106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.011. View

4.
Haines L, Perevozskaya I, Rosenberger W . Bayesian optimal designs for Phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 2003; 59(3):591-600. DOI: 10.1111/1541-0420.00069. View

5.
Johnston K, Bruno A, Pauls Q, Hall C, Barrett K, Barsan W . Intensive vs Standard Treatment of Hyperglycemia and Functional Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SHINE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019; 322(4):326-335. PMC: 6652154. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.9346. View