» Articles » PMID: 33431079

The Effect of a Fresh Produce Incentive Paired with Cooking and Nutrition Education on Healthy Eating in Low-income Households: a Pilot Study

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 12
PMID 33431079
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study pilot-tested combining financial incentives to purchase fruits and vegetables with nutrition education focused on cooking to increase the consumption of fruits and vegetables and improve attitudes around healthy eating on a budget among low-income adults. The goal of the pilot study was to examine implementation feasibility and fidelity, acceptability of the intervention components by participants and effectiveness.

Design: The study design was a pre-post individual-level comparison without a control group. The pilot intervention included two components, a scan card providing free produce up to a weekly maximum dollar amount for use over a 2-month period, and two sessions of tailored nutrition and cooking education. Outcomes included self-reported attitudes about healthy eating and daily fruit and vegetable consumption from one 24-h dietary recall collected before and after the intervention.

Setting: Greater Minneapolis/St. Paul area in Minnesota.

Participants: Adults (n 120) were recruited from five community food pantries.

Results: Findings indicated that the financial incentive component of the intervention was highly feasible and acceptable to participants, but attendance at the nutrition education sessions was moderate. Participants had a statistically significant increase in the consumption of fruit, from an average of 1·00 cup/d to 1·78 cups/d (P < 0·001), but no significant change in vegetable consumption or attitudes with respect to their ability to put together a healthy meal.

Conclusions: While combining financial incentives with nutrition education appears to be acceptable to low-income adult participants, barriers to attend nutrition education sessions need to be addressed in future research.

Citing Articles

An environmental scan of financial incentives to increase access to healthy foods: How, how much, and how often?.

Quach A, Yohannes S, Olstad D, Campbell D, Corrigan C, Beall R BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):689.

PMID: 39972336 PMC: 11841262. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21855-9.


Community-based fruit and vegetable prescription programs: a scoping review.

Greatorex Brooks E, McInerney M J Nutr Sci. 2023; 12:e99.

PMID: 37744640 PMC: 10511821. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2023.81.


Evaluating Moderation of Parent-Teen Overweight/Obesity Relation by Household Socioeconomic Status.

Conrad Z, Hatfield D, Hennessy E, Maneval E, Ty E, Pankey C Curr Dev Nutr. 2021; 5(4):nzab030.

PMID: 33959690 PMC: 8085476. DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab030.

References
1.
Hartmann C, Dohle S, Siegrist M . Importance of cooking skills for balanced food choices. Appetite. 2013; 65:125-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.016. View

2.
Dauchet L, Amouyel P, Hercberg S, Dallongeville J . Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Nutr. 2006; 136(10):2588-93. DOI: 10.1093/jn/136.10.2588. View

3.
Virudachalam S, Long J, Harhay M, Polsky D, Feudtner C . Prevalence and patterns of cooking dinner at home in the USA: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008. Public Health Nutr. 2013; 17(5):1022-30. PMC: 10282260. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013002589. View

4.
Blakely T, Ni Mhurchu C, Jiang Y, Matoe L, Funaki-Tahifote M, Eyles H . Do effects of price discounts and nutrition education on food purchases vary by ethnicity, income and education? Results from a randomised, controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011; 65(10):902-8. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.118588. View

5.
Hebert J, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene I, Ockene J . Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995; 24(2):389-98. DOI: 10.1093/ije/24.2.389. View