» Articles » PMID: 33430698

Priority-setting Dilemmas, Moral Distress and Support Experienced by Nurses and Physicians in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Norway

Overview
Journal Nurs Ethics
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Medical Ethics
Nursing
Date 2021 Jan 12
PMID 33430698
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has imposed challenges on healthcare systems and professionals worldwide and introduced a ´maelstrom´ of ethical dilemmas. How ethically demanding situations are handled affects employees' moral stress and job satisfaction.

Aim: Describe priority-setting dilemmas, moral distress and support experienced by nurses and physicians across medical specialties in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Western Norway.

Research Design: A cross-sectional hospital-based survey was conducted from 23 April to 11 May 2020.

Ethical Considerations: Ethical approval granted by the Regional Research Ethics Committee in Western Norway (131421).

Findings: Among the 1606 respondents, 67% had experienced priority-setting dilemmas the previous two weeks. Healthcare workers who were directly involved in COVID-19 care, were redeployed or worked in psychiatry/addiction medicine experienced it more often. Although 59% of the respondents had seen adverse consequences due to resource scarcity, severe consequences were rare. Moral distress levels were generally low (2.9 on a 0-10 scale), but higher in selected groups (redeployed, managers and working in psychiatry/addiction medicine). Backing from existing collegial and managerial structures and routines, such as discussions with colleagues and receiving updates and information from managers that listened and acted upon feedback, were found more helpful than external support mechanisms. Priority-setting guidelines were also helpful.

Discussion: By including all medical specialties, nurses and physicians, and various institutions, the study provides information on how the COVID-19 mitigation also influenced those not directly involved in the COVID-19 treatment of patients. In the next stages of the pandemic response, support for healthcare professionals directly involved in outbreak-affected patients, those redeployed or those most impacted by mitigation strategies must be a priority.

Conclusion: Empirical research of healthcare workers experiences under a pandemic are important to identify groups at risks and useful support mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Severity and associated factors of moral injury in healthcare workers during the coronavirus pandemic: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Jafari M, Nassehi A, Jafari J, Jafari-Oori M Arch Public Health. 2025; 83(1):37.

PMID: 39953612 PMC: 11827436. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-025-01518-2.


Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fischer A, Fenning R, Robb J, Slater A, Mai U, Lam T BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e089980.

PMID: 39933805 PMC: 11815442. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089980.


War-related continuous traumatic stress as a potential mediator of associations between moral distress and professional quality of life in nurses: a cross-sectional study in Ukraine.

Zasiekina L, Martyniuk A BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):16.

PMID: 39762818 PMC: 11706165. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02668-4.


"The leadership shown by nurses gave me such a boost": health resources used by nurses who experienced COVID-19 pandemic stressors.

Bachmann A, Cohen C, Abt M, Gilles I, Delmas P, Ortoleva Bucher C Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2432687.

PMID: 39580814 PMC: 11587734. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2432687.


Moral distress and protective work environment for healthcare workers during public health emergencies.

Bondjers K, Glad A, Woien H, Wentzel-Larsen T, Atar D, Reitan S BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):103.

PMID: 39354454 PMC: 11443852. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01098-w.


References
1.
Delfrate F, Ferrara P, Spotti D, Terzoni S, Lamiani G, Canciani E . Moral Distress (MD) and burnout in mental health nurses: a multicenter survey. Med Lav. 2018; 109(2):97-109. PMC: 7682177. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v109i2.6876. View

2.
Papadimos T, Marcolini E, Hadian M, Hardart G, Ward N, Levy M . Ethics of Outbreaks Position Statement. Part 1: Therapies, Treatment Limitations, and Duty to Treat. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46(11):1842-1855. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003416. View

3.
Dunn M, Sheehan M, Hordern J, Turnham H, Wilkinson D . 'Your country needs you': the ethics of allocating staff to high-risk clinical roles in the management of patients with COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2020; 46(7):436-440. PMC: 7246092. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106284. View

4.
Berhane Defaye F, Desalegn D, Danis M, Hurst S, Berhane Y, Norheim O . A survey of Ethiopian physicians' experiences of bedside rationing: extensive resource scarcity, tough decisions and adverse consequences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:467. PMC: 4607248. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1131-6. View

5.
Benedek D, Fullerton C, Ursano R . First responders: mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28:55-68. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144037. View