» Articles » PMID: 33428677

Exploring Barriers to the Adoption and Utilization of Improved Latrine Facilities in Rural Ethiopia: An Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (IBM-WASH) Approach

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Jan 11
PMID 33428677
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Even though evidence shows that access to and use of improved latrines is related to healthful families and the public, obstacles to the adoption and use of improved latrine facilities remain. Globally, not many inquiries appear to have been carried out to satisfactorily inform us regarding the multi-level barriers influencing the adoption and utilization of improved latrines facilities. Related studies in Ethiopia are even fewer.

Methods: Two qualitative data gathering methods, viz., key informant interviews and focus group discussions, were employed to collect data for this study. A total of fifteen focus group discussions were conducted with members of the community in the rural Wonago district of Ethiopia. Similarly, ten key informant interviews were conducted with water, sanitation, and hygiene officers, and health extension workers responsible for coordinating sanitation and hygiene activities. Open code software 4.03 was used for thematic analysis.

Result: Barriers to adoption and use of improved latrine facilities were categorized into Contextual factors (e.g. Gender, educational status, personal preference for using the field, limited space, population density, the status of land ownership), Psychosocial factors (Culture, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of minimal health threat from children's feces), and Technological factors (inconveniences in acquiring materials and cost of constructing a latrine).

Conclusion: There are a series of multi-leveled barriers to the sustained adoption and use of latrines. Providing funding opportunities for the underprivileged and offering training on the engineering skills of latrine construction at the community level based on the contextual soil circumstances could expand the latrine coverage and use. Similarly, taking into account the variability in motivations for adopting and using latrines among our study in Ethiopia and other studies, we implore public health experts to recognize behaviors and norms in their target communities in advance of implementing sanitation interventions.

Citing Articles

Contextual and psychosocial factors associated with latrine utilization in rural communities in Ethiopia.

Golla E, Geremew H, Abate A, Ali M, Simegn M, Wondie S Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1387861.

PMID: 39722712 PMC: 11669306. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1387861.


Determinants of Basic Sanitation Service Coverage Among Households in Shashogo District, Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia: A Case Control Study.

Tefera T, Alemu T, Alano A Environ Health Insights. 2024; 18:11786302241282378.

PMID: 39315005 PMC: 11418298. DOI: 10.1177/11786302241282378.


Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia.

Ismail A, Ibrahim M, Abdi M, Geremew A, Mulugeta Y, Ayele D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1394351.

PMID: 38751595 PMC: 11094270. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394351.


Latrine Utilization and its Associated Factors in Urban Slums Dwellers of Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Yirdaw G, Dessie A, Azanaw J, Birhan T Environ Health Insights. 2023; 17:11786302231203067.

PMID: 37846326 PMC: 10576917. DOI: 10.1177/11786302231203067.


Excreta Disgust and Adaptive Use of Ecological Sanitation By-Products: Perspectives of Rural Farmers in Burera District, Rwanda.

Banamwana C, Musoke D, Ntakirutimana T, Buregyeya E, Ssempebwa J, Wamuyu-Maina G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(18).

PMID: 37754603 PMC: 10530874. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20186743.


References
1.
Mara D, Lane J, Scott B, Trouba D . Sanitation and health. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(11):e1000363. PMC: 2981586. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000363. View

2.
Aluko O, Afolabi O, Olaoye E, Adebayo A, Oyetola S, Abegunde O . The management of the faeces passed by under five children: an exploratory, cross-sectional research in an urban community in Southwest Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):178. PMC: 5299761. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4078-1. View

3.
Adane M, Mengistie B, Kloos H, Medhin G, Mulat W . Sanitation facilities, hygienic conditions, and prevalence of acute diarrhea among under-five children in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Baseline survey of a longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0182783. PMC: 5576656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182783. View

4.
Tessema R . Assessment of the implementation of community-led total sanitation, hygiene, and associated factors in Diretiyara district, Eastern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0175233. PMC: 5390995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175233. View

5.
Kayser G, Rao N, Jose R, Raj A . Water, sanitation and hygiene: measuring gender equality and empowerment. Bull World Health Organ. 2019; 97(6):438-440. PMC: 6560376. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.18.223305. View