Clinical Efficacy of Vertical or Parallel Technique of a Micro-Locking Plate for Treatment of Dubberley B-Type Capitellar Fractures

Overview

Journal Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2021 Jan 11

PMID 33426763

Citations 2

Authors

Yao Lu

Lei Fu

Teng Ma

Yi-Bo Xu

Li-Ping Xu

Zhe Song

Shan Fan

Qian Wang

Liang Sun

Han-Zhong Xue

Zhong Li

Kun Zhang

De-Yin Liu

Cheng Ren

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of micro-locking plate through vertical or parallel technique for treatment of Dubberley B-type capitellar fractures.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 24 patients (17 males and seven females, with an average age of 44.9 years, range from 19 to 75 years) with capitellar fractures that were treated with micro-locking plate using vertical or parallel technique between January 2016 to January 2019. The inclusion criteria include closed capitellar fracture, normal anterior elbow joint movement before injury, and recent capitellar fracture with injury within past 3 weeks. Fractures classified according to Dubberley included four cases of type IB, eight cases of type IIB, and 12 cases of type IIIB. Radiographic evaluation was performed. Surgery time, blood loss, range of motion of the elbow, forearm rotation, and complications were recorded. Elbow joint function was evaluated by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results: The mean follow-up period was 19.6 months (range, 12-36 months). The average clinical healing time for fractures was 11.2 ± 3.2 weeks (range, 8-20 weeks). Fracture united in all patients. Two patients showed slight delayed union, but union was achieved eventually. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6.3 ± 3.1 days (range, 2-15 days). The average surgical time was 68.1 ± 11.5 min (range, 50-90 min), and the mean blood loss was 75.2 ± 26.5 mL (range, 40-120 mL). The mean range of flexion was 122.5° ± 10.5°(range, 95°-140°). The mean range of extension was 8.5° ± 5.8°(range, 0°-20°). The mean range of pronation was 79.7° ± 8.0°(range, 65°-90°). The mean range of supination was 80.5° ± 7.1°(range, 60°-90°). The mean MEPS at final follow-up was 89.8 ± 9.0 (range, 60-100). Based on the MEPS, 18 (75%) patients had excellent, five (20.8%) patients had good, and one (4.2%) patient had fair. None of the 24 patients suffered vascular or nerve injury. One patient showed superficial infection, which was treated with surgical dressing.

Conclusions: The vertical or parallel technique of the micro-locking plate is an excellent method for treating Dubberley B-type capitellar fractures.

Citing Articles

Are outcomes after fixation of distal humerus coronal shear fractures affected by surgical approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fisher K, Livesey M, Sax O, Gilotra M, OHara N, Henn 3rd R JSES Int. 2022; 6(6):1054-1061.

PMID: 36353417 PMC: 9637809. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.011.

Biomechanical stability of complex coronal plane fracture fixation of the capitellum.

Borbas P, Loucas R, Loucas M, Vetter M, Hofstede S, Ernstbrunner L Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(11):3239-3246.

PMID: 34424387 PMC: 9522805. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04126-1.

References

Miclau T, Martin R . The evolution of modern plate osteosynthesis. Injury. 1997; 28 Suppl 1:A3-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)90109-1. View

Jupiter J, Mehne D . Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthopedics. 1992; 15(7):825-33. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19920701-07. View

Ruchelsman D, Tejwani N, Kwon Y, Egol K . Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(6):1321-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00940. View

Yu T, Tao H, Xu F, Hu Y, Zhang C, Zhou G . Comparison of lateral approach versus anterolateral approach with Herbert screw fixation for isolated coronal shear fractures of humeral capitellum. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1):230. PMC: 6647071. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1261-3. View

Sano S, Rokkaku T, Saito S, Tokunaga S, Abe Y, Moriya H . Herbert screw fixation of capitellar fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(3):307-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.005. View

Kramer M, Pamnani A, Strauch R . Internal fixation of a capitellum fracture using a biodegradable screw. Orthopedics. 2002; 25(7):765-6. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20020701-20. View

Mighell M, Virani N, Shannon R, Echols Jr E, Badman B, Keating C . Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 19(1):38-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.012. View

Ravishankar M, Kumar M, Raut R . Choice of surgical approach for capitellar fractures based on pathoanatomy of fractures: outcomes of surgical management. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016; 27(2):233-242. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1877-5. View

Tanwar Y, Kharbanda Y, Jaiswal A, Birla V, Pandit R . Retrospective analysis of open reduction and internal fixation of coronal plane fractures of the capitellum and trochlea using the anterolateral approach. SICOT J. 2018; 4:8. PMC: 5855499. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017063. View

10.

Srinivasan K, Agarwal M, Matthews S, Giannoudis P . Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is internal fixation the treatment of choice?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):222-30. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000154010.43568.5b. View

11.

Dubberley J, Faber K, MacDermid J, Patterson S, King G . Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(1):46-54. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02954. View

12.

Holdsworth B, Mossad M . Fractures of the adult distal humerus. Elbow function after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(3):362-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B3.2341427. View

13.

Sabo M, Fay K, McDonald C, Ferreira L, Johnson J, King G . Effect of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus on elbow kinematics and stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(5):670-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.002. View

14.

Carroll M, Athwal G, King G, Faber K . Capitellar and Trochlear Fractures. Hand Clin. 2015; 31(4):615-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.07.001. View

15.

Singh A, Singh A . Coronal shear fractures of distal humerus: Diagnostic and treatment protocols. World J Orthop. 2015; 6(11):867-76. PMC: 4686434. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.867. View

16.

Vaishya R, Vijay V, Jha G, Agarwal A . Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fracture through anterolateral approach with headless double-threaded compression screws: a series of 16 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(7):1182-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.034. View

17.

Phadnis J, Watts A, Bain G . Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(3):171-83. PMC: 4950283. DOI: 10.1177/1758573216640210. View

18.

Singh A, Singh A, Vaishya R, Jain A, Gulati D . Fractures of capitellum: a review of 14 cases treated by open reduction and internal fixation with Herbert screws. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(6):897-901. PMC: 2989024. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0896-9. View

19.

Yari S, Bowers N, Craig M, Reichel L . Management of distal humeral coronal shear fractures. World J Clin Cases. 2015; 3(5):405-17. PMC: 4419104. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.405. View

20.

Fram B, Seigerman D, Ilyas A . Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus: A Review of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes. Hand (N Y). 2019; 16(5):577-585. PMC: 8461205. DOI: 10.1177/1558944719878817. View