Facing Metaphyseal Bone Stock Defects: Mid- and Longterm Results of Cones
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Panni A, Vasso M, Cerciello S
. Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(12):2837-43.
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2258-1.
View
2.
Faizan A, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Alipit V, Kirk A, Krebs V, Harwin S
. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(6):1946-1953.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.013.
View
3.
Bae D, Song S, Heo D, Lee S, Song W
. Long-term survival rate of implants and modes of failure after revision total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 28(7):1130-4.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.021.
View
4.
Engh G, Ammeen D
. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999; 48:167-75.
View
5.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M
. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(4):780-5.
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
View