» Articles » PMID: 33424186

Options and Limitations of Implant Constraint

Overview
Journal J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jan 11
PMID 33424186
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With an ever-increasing number of revisions, the surgeons will be faced with the dilemma of choosing the right implant for the revision knee. The soft tissue viability governs the choice of an implant at the time of revision. The selection ranges from the cruciate-retaining to the rotating/fixed hinge implants. The surgeon needs to plan preoperatively, but usually, the final decisions are made intraoperative. As determining the amount of constraint necessary can be challenging, we have tried to lay down a few pointers, which would help to make that choice. The posterior stabilized implants can manage most revision knees; in certain situations where they cannot accommodate the flexion-extension gap imbalance, a varus-valgus constrained implant should be used. The rotating hinge implants are used for severe instabilities or loss of soft tissue or bone around the knee. The use of a higher constraint implant has its consequences like reduced life span and reduced function. Thus it is crucial to use the least amount of constraint as necessary - however, as much as required.

Citing Articles

Robotic-assisted Conversion of Arthrodesis to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Stauss R, Savov P, Pott H, Ettinger M Arthroplast Today. 2025; 32:101628.

PMID: 40035047 PMC: 11875810. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101628.


Role and Results of Constrained Insert in Computer-Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Study.

Jhurani A, Agarwal P, Sahni H, Ardawatia G, Srivastava M Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101423.

PMID: 38946924 PMC: 11214376. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101423.


Comparative Functional and Isokinetic Analysis between Implants with Posterior Stabilization and Rotating Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Minamoto S, de Paula Mozella A, Cossich V, Gavilao U, Machado H, Barretto J Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(1):e68-e75.

PMID: 38524713 PMC: 10957273. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779685.


Mid-term outcomes of a kinematically designed cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Katzman J, Habibi A, Haider M, Cardillo C, Fernandez-Madrid I, Meftah M World J Orthop. 2024; 15(2):118-128.

PMID: 38464356 PMC: 10921185. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i2.118.


Octogenarians Are the New Sexagenarians: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Inferior to Posterior-Stabilized Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients.

DAmbrosi R, Menon P, Salunke A, Mariani I, Palminteri G, Basile G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35807083 PMC: 9267517. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133795.

References
1.
ARDEN G . Total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973; (94):92-103. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197307000-00012. View

2.
Haidukewych G . Role of Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures Above a Total Knee Arthroplasty: When and How?. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33 Suppl 6:S33-S35. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001566. View

3.
Kang S, Park C, Song S . Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Indications, Stem Dimensions, and Fixation Methods. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018; 30(3):187-192. PMC: 6122937. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.18.019. View

4.
Mortazavi S, Kurd M, Bender B, Post Z, Parvizi J, Purtill J . Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(5):775-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.024. View

5.
Kusswetter W, Baumann D . [Total knee replacement using the Walldius hinge joint (author's transl)]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1977; 88(2):199-215. DOI: 10.1007/BF00415100. View