» Articles » PMID: 33422727

Healthy Ankle and Hindfoot Kinematics During Gait: Sex Differences, Asymmetry and Coupled Motion Revealed Through Dynamic Biplane Radiography

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2021 Jan 10
PMID 33422727
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare male versus female and dominant versus non-dominant kinematics in the ankle and hindfoot, and to characterize coupled motion between the subtalar and tibiotalar joints during the support phase of gait. Twenty healthy adults walked on a laboratory walkway while synchronized biplane radiographs of the ankle and hindfoot were collected at 100 frames/s. A validated tracking technique was used to measure tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics. Differences between male and female range of motion (ROM) were observed only in tibiotalar (AP and ML) and subtalar (ML) translation (all differences<1 mm and all p < 0.04). Statistical parametric mapping identified differences between kinematics waveforms of males and females in tibiotalar translation (AP and ML) and eversion, and subtalar ML translation. No differences between dominant and non-dominant sides were observed in ROM or kinematics waveforms. The average absolute side-to-side difference in the kinematics waveforms was 4.1° and 1.5 mm or less for all rotations and translations, respectively. Tibiotalar plantarflexion was coupled to subtalar inversion and eversion during the impact and push-off phases of stance (r = 0.90 and r = 0.87, respectively). This data may serve as a guide for evaluating ankle kinematics waveforms, ROM, symmetry, and restoration of healthy coupled motion after surgical intervention or rehabilitation. The observed kinematics differences between males and females may predispose females to higher rates of ankle and knee injury and suggest sex-dependent ankle reconstruction techniques may be beneficial.

Citing Articles

Human talocrural contributions to ankle joint complex kinematics during walking, running, and hopping.

Behling A, Welte L, Rainbow M, Kelly L Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41301.

PMID: 39850436 PMC: 11755030. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41301.


Effects of additional weight-bearing on the in vivo kinematics of the human ankle joint complex during walking.

Wang S, Qian Z, Liu X, Song G, Jiang Z, Wang K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29049.

PMID: 39580514 PMC: 11585603. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80716-4.


Influence of Talar and Calcaneal Morphology on Subtalar Kinematics During Walking.

Yamamoto T, Paulus P, Setliff J, Hogan M, Anderst W Foot Ankle Int. 2024; 45(6):632-640.

PMID: 38491768 PMC: 11164638. DOI: 10.1177/10711007241231981.


Ankle and subtalar joint axes of rotation and center of rotation during walking and running in healthy individuals measured using dynamic biplane radiography.

Paulus P, Gale T, Setliff J, Yamamoto T, Yang S, Brown J J Biomech. 2023; 160:111837.

PMID: 37837836 PMC: 11006825. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111837.


Increased subtalar rotational motion in patients with symptomatic ankle instability under load and stress conditions.

Fernandez-Marin M, Gonzalez-Martin D, Herrera-Perez M, Paulano-Godino F, Vila-Rico J, Tejero S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(11):5214-5221.

PMID: 37770749 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07553-2.


References
1.
Lundgren P, Nester C, Liu A, Arndt A, Jones R, Stacoff A . Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait Posture. 2007; 28(1):93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.009. View

2.
Caputo A, Lee J, Spritzer C, Easley M, DeOrio J, Nunley 2nd J . In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(11):2241-8. PMC: 2891039. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509337578. View

3.
Campbell K, Wilson K, LaPrade R, Clanton T . Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 24(4):1402-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3084-4. View

4.
Alazzawi S, Sukeik M, King D, Vemulapalli K . Foot and ankle history and clinical examination: A guide to everyday practice. World J Orthop. 2017; 8(1):21-29. PMC: 5241541. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i1.21. View

5.
Pataky T . Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping. J Biomech. 2010; 43(10):1976-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008. View