Predicted Benefit of an Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator: the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not uniform due to differences in the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and non-arrhythmic mortality. We aimed to develop an ICD benefit prediction score that integrates the competing risks.
Methods And Results: The study population comprised all 4531 patients enrolled in the MADIT trials. Best-subsets Fine and Gray regression analysis was used to develop prognostic models for VT (≥200 b.p.m.)/VF vs. non-arrhythmic mortality (defined as death without prior sustained VT/VF). Eight predictors of VT/VF (male, age < 75 years, prior non-sustained VT, heart rate > 75 b.p.m., systolic blood pressure < 140 mmHg, ejection fraction ≤ 25%, myocardial infarction, and atrialarrhythmia) and 7 predictors of non-arrhythmic mortality (age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, body mass index < 23 kg/m2, ejection fraction ≤ 25%, New York Heart Association ≥II, ICD vs. cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator, and atrial arrhythmia) were identified. The two scores were combined to create three MADIT-ICD benefit groups. In the highest benefit group, the 3-year predicted risk of VT/VF was three-fold higher than the risk of non-arrhythmic mortality (20% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). In the intermediate benefit group, the difference in the corresponding predicted risks was attenuated (15% vs. 9%, P < 0.01). In the lowest benefit group, the 3-year predicted risk of VT/VF was similar to the risk of non-arrhythmic mortality (11% vs. 12%, P = 0.41). A personalized ICD benefit score was developed based on the distribution of the two competing risks scores in the study population (https://is.gd/madit). Internal and external validation confirmed model stability.
Conclusions: We propose the novel MADIT-ICD benefit score that predicts the likelihood of prophylactic ICD benefit through personalized assessment of the risk of VT/VF weighed against the risk of non-arrhythmic mortality.
Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Elderly Patients.
Hagiwara H, Nagai N, Otsubo K, Sasaki S, Aoyagi H, Chiba Y Circ Rep. 2025; 7(1):15-24.
PMID: 39802131 PMC: 11711620. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0131.
Smoking and sudden cardiac death in patients with previous coronary artery disease.
Jarvensivu-Koivunen M, Hernesniemi J, Tynkkynen J Coron Artery Dis. 2024; 36(1):59-64.
PMID: 39652651 PMC: 11617078. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001421.
Wilson D, Sharma-Oates A, Sheldon J, Power D, Lord J, Roberts P Open Heart. 2024; 11(2).
PMID: 39401956 PMC: 11474826. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002574.
Sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction: individual participant data from pooled cohorts.
Peek N, Hindricks G, Akbarov A, Tijssen J, Jenkins D, Kapacee Z Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(43):4616-4626.
PMID: 39378245 PMC: 11560274. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae326.
Chiba T, Kondo Y, Shiko Y, Nakano M, Takatsugu K, Nakano M ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 12(1):369-378.
PMID: 39300933 PMC: 11769601. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.15081.