» Articles » PMID: 33417475

Circular Multielectrode Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Lasso Pulsed Field Ablation: Lesion Characteristics, Durability, and Effect on Neighboring Structures

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33417475
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy with potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation. This study investigated a novel PFA system-a circular multielectrode catheter (PFA lasso) and a multichannel generator designed to work with Carto 3 mapping system.

Methods: A 7.5F bidirectional circular catheter with 10 electrodes and variable expansion was designed for PFA (biphasic, 1800 Volts). This study included a total of 16 swine used to investigate the following 3 experimental aims: Aim 1 examined the feasibility to create a right atrial ablation line of block from the superior vena cava to the inferior vena cava. Aim 2 examined the effect of PFA on lesion maturation including durability after a 30-day survival period. Aim 3 examined the effect of high-intensity PFA (10 applications) on esophageal and phrenic nerve tissue in comparison to normal intensity radiofrequency ablation (1-2 applications). Histopathologic analysis of all cardiac, esophageal, and phrenic nerve tissue was performed.

Results: Acute line of block was achieved in 12/12 swine (100%) and required a total PFA time of 14 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 9-24.5) per line. Ablation line durability after 28±3 days was maintained in 11/12 (91.7%) swine. PFA resulted in transmural lesions in 179/183 (97.8%) sections and a median lesion width of 14.2 mm. High-intensity PFA (9 [IQR, 8-14] application) had no effect on the esophagus while standard intensity radiofrequency ablation (1.5 [IQR, 1-2] applications) resulted in deep esophageal tissue injury involving the muscularis propria and adventitia layers. High-intensity PFA (16 [IQR, 10-28] applications) has no effect on phrenic nerve function and structure while standard dose radiofrequency ablation (1.5 [IQR, 1-2] applications) resulted in acute phrenic nerve paralysis.

Conclusions: In this preclinical model, a multielectrode circular catheter and multichannel generator produced durable atrial lesions with lower vulnerability to esophageal or phrenic nerve damage.

Citing Articles

Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients.

Borlich M, Groschke S, Wietgrefe J, Witt F, Paulssen A, Fichtlscherer S J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39899143 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-01981-5.


Comparison of efficiency of PFA catheter designs by computer modeling.

Belalcazar A, Heist E J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024; 35(12):2382-2393.

PMID: 39377574 PMC: 11650406. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16459.


Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Safety and Effectiveness in the AdmIRE Pivotal Trial.

Reddy V, Calkins H, Mansour M, Wazni O, Di Biase L, Bahu M Circulation. 2024; 150(15):1174-1186.

PMID: 39258362 PMC: 11458102. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070333.


Application repetition and electrode-tissue contact result in deeper lesions using a pulsed-field ablation circular variable loop catheter.

Di Biase L, Marazzato J, Gomez T, Byun E, Zou F, Grupposo V Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39150065 PMC: 11393494. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae220.


Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations.

Jiang S, Qian F, Ji S, Li L, Liu Q, Zhou S Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(4):138.

PMID: 39076550 PMC: 11264014. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2504138.


References
1.
Koruth J, Kuroki K, Iwasawa J, Enomoto Y, Viswanathan R, Brose R . Preclinical Evaluation of Pulsed Field Ablation: Electrophysiological and Histological Assessment of Thoracic Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019; 12(12):e007781. PMC: 6924932. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007781. View

2.
Neven K, van Driel V, van Wessel H, van Es R, du Pre B, Doevendans P . Safety and feasibility of closed chest epicardial catheter ablation using electroporation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7(5):913-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001607. View

3.
Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn C, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes F, Govari A . High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4(4):467-479. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. View

4.
Reddy V, Neuzil P, Koruth J, Petru J, Funosako M, Cochet H . Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(3):315-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021. View

5.
van Driel V, Neven K, van Wessel H, Vink A, Doevendans P, Wittkampf F . Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12(8):1838-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.012. View