» Articles » PMID: 33415375

Situational Risk Factors for Fall-related Vertebral Fractures in Older Men and Women

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33415375
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: A matched case-control study was conducted to investigate the effects of situational factors, in addition to predisposing factors, on clinical vertebral fractures in older men and women in Taiwan.

Methods: Cases were community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years who visited emergency departments (EDs) of two university-affiliated hospitals due to a fall and had a primary diagnosis of a vertebral fracture during a 1-year period in 2017. Five control patients per case, matched by the time of falling, gender, and age, who sought care in the same ED due to a fall resulting in a soft tissue injury were selected. A total of 64 men (age range: 65 ~ 99 years) and 194 women (age range: 65 ~ 100 years), diagnosed with a vertebral fracture, participated in the study.

Results: Multivariable logistic models were conducted separately for men and women. Results suggested that the following factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures in men: a low educational level (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02 ~ 3.71), asthma (OR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.35 ~ 6.92), depression (OR = 4.31; 95% CI, 1.03 ~ 17.5), toileting (OR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.04 ~ 4.94), slipping (OR = 5.27; 95% CI, 1.80 ~ 15.4), stepping down (OR = 3.99; 95% CI, 1.40 ~ 11.4), sudden leg weakness (OR = 3.73; 95% CI, 1.13 ~ 12.4), and falling backwards (OR = 3.78; 95% CI, 1.83 ~ 7.80); and in women: a fracture history (OR = 2.00; 95% CI, 1.07 ~ 3.76), osteoporosis (OR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.15 ~ 3.49), getting in/out of the bed/chair (OR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.07 ~ 3.39), stepping down (OR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.17 ~ 3.77), and falling backwards (OR = 4.00; 95% CI, 2.39 ~ 6.68) and sideways (OR = 2.61; 95% CI, 1.38 ~ 4.96).

Conclusions: The combination of predisposing and situational risk factors may display a more comprehensive risk profile for the occurrence of VFs, and thus, interventions that add both types of risk factors may result in greater risk reduction of VFs, although those specifically targeted at situational risk factors during falls are limited and their effectiveness and efficiency remained to be explored.

Citing Articles

Clinical analysis of transverse process fractures: A comprehensive study on patient characteristics, management, and outcomes in trauma care.

Gunerhan G, Akpinar A, Cagil E Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024; 30(5):353-360.

PMID: 38738678 PMC: 11154072. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.91387.


Oral Frailty as a Risk Factor for Fall Incidents among Community-Dwelling People.

Yokoyama H, Kitano Y Geriatrics (Basel). 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38667521 PMC: 11050511. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9020054.


Editorial: Community series - reducing the burden of age-related disease in relation to osteoporosis, sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia, volume II.

Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Khashayar P, Quyyumi A, Nabipour I, Dabbaghmanesh M, Zakraoui L Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 10:1344694.

PMID: 38173944 PMC: 10764019. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1344694.


Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.

Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1137671.

PMID: 37143730 PMC: 10151776. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671.


Effects of resistance and balance exercises for athletic ability and quality of life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Li X, Chen W, Chen Q, Li F, Chen C, Li P Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1135063.

PMID: 36968833 PMC: 10033532. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1135063.


References
1.
Papaioannou A, Watts N, Kendler D, Yuen C, Adachi J, Ferko N . Diagnosis and management of vertebral fractures in elderly adults. Am J Med. 2002; 113(3):220-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01190-7. View

2.
Lindsay R, Silverman S, Cooper C, Hanley D, Barton I, Broy S . Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001; 285(3):320-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.3.320. View

3.
Buckens C, de Jong P, Mali W, Verhaar H, van der Graaf Y, Verkooijen H . Prevalent vertebral fractures on chest CT: higher risk for future hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2013; 29(2):392-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2028. View

4.
Ross P . Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med. 1997; 103(2A):30S-42S; discussion 42S-43S. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90025-5. View

5.
Ensrud K, Schousboe J . Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(17):1634-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1009697. View