» Articles » PMID: 33414699

Semi-Automated and Direct Localization and Labeling of EEG Electrodes Using MR Structural Images for Simultaneous FMRI-EEG

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33414699
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) source reconstruction estimates spatial information from the brain's electrical activity acquired using EEG. This method requires accurate identification of the EEG electrodes in a three-dimensional (3D) space and involves spatial localization and labeling of EEG electrodes. Here, we propose a new approach to tackle this two-step problem based on the simultaneous acquisition of EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the step of spatial localization of electrodes, we extract the electrode coordinates from the curvature of the protrusions formed in the high-resolution T1-weighted brain scans. In the next step, we assign labels to each electrode based on the distinguishing feature of the electrode's distance profile in relation to other electrodes. We then compare the subject's electrode data with template-based models of prelabeled distance profiles of correctly labeled subjects. Based on this approach, we could localize EEG electrodes in 26 head models with over 90% accuracy in the 3D localization of electrodes. Next, we performed electrode labeling of the subjects' data with progressive improvements in accuracy: with ∼58% accuracy based on a single EEG-template, with ∼71% accuracy based on 3 EEG-templates, and with ∼76% accuracy using 5 EEG-templates. The proposed semi-automated method provides a simple alternative for the rapid localization and labeling of electrodes without the requirement of any additional equipment than what is already used in an EEG-fMRI setup.

Citing Articles

Systematic Review Between Resting-State fMRI and Task fMRI in Planning for Brain Tumour Surgery.

Abu Mhanna H, Omar A, Radzi Y, Oglat A, Akhdar H, Al Ewaidat H J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:2409-2424.

PMID: 38784380 PMC: 11111578. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S470809.


Variability of EEG electrode positions and their underlying brain regions: visualizing gel artifacts from a simultaneous EEG-fMRI dataset.

Scrivener C, Reader A Brain Behav. 2022; 12(2):e2476.

PMID: 35040596 PMC: 8865144. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2476.

References
1.
De Munck J, van Houdt P, Verdaasdonk R, Ossenblok P . A semi-automatic method to determine electrode positions and labels from gel artifacts in EEG/fMRI-studies. Neuroimage. 2011; 59(1):399-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.021. View

2.
Lamm C, Windischberger C, Leodolter U, Moser E, Bauer H . Co-registration of EEG and MRI data using matching of spline interpolated and MRI-segmented reconstructions of the scalp surface. Brain Topogr. 2002; 14(2):93-100. DOI: 10.1023/a:1012988728672. View

3.
Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher J, Pantazis D, Leahy R . Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:879716. PMC: 3090754. DOI: 10.1155/2011/879716. View

4.
Bushby K, Cole T, Matthews J, Goodship J . Centiles for adult head circumference. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67(10):1286-7. PMC: 1793909. DOI: 10.1136/adc.67.10.1286. View

5.
Dalal S, Rampp S, Willomitzer F, Ettl S . Consequences of EEG electrode position error on ultimate beamformer source reconstruction performance. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:42. PMC: 3949288. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00042. View