» Articles » PMID: 33413469

Comparisons of Individual- and Area-level Socioeconomic Status As Proxies for Individual-level Measures: Evidence from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33413469
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Area-level measures are often used to approximate socioeconomic status (SES) when individual-level data are not available. However, no national studies have examined the validity of these measures in approximating individual-level SES.

Methods: Data came from ~ 3,471,000 participants in the Mortality Disparities in American Communities study, which links data from 2008 American Community Survey to National Death Index (through 2015). We calculated correlations, specificity, sensitivity, and odds ratios to summarize the concordance between individual-, census tract-, and county-level SES indicators (e.g., household income, college degree, unemployment). We estimated the association between each SES measure and mortality to illustrate the implications of misclassification for estimates of the SES-mortality association.

Results: Participants with high individual-level SES were more likely than other participants to live in high-SES areas. For example, individuals with high household incomes were more likely to live in census tracts (r = 0.232; odds ratio [OR] = 2.284) or counties (r = 0.157; OR = 1.325) whose median household income was above the US median. Across indicators, mortality was higher among low-SES groups (all p < .0001). Compared to county-level, census tract-level measures more closely approximated individual-level associations with mortality.

Conclusions: Moderate agreement emerged among binary indicators of SES across individual, census tract, and county levels, with increased precision for census tract compared to county measures when approximating individual-level values. When area level measures were used as proxies for individual SES, the SES-mortality associations were systematically underestimated. Studies using area-level SES proxies should use caution when selecting, analyzing, and interpreting associations with health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Utilize administrative data to assess impact of individual-level and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on childhood health in a longitudinal study.

Meeks H, Yu D, Fraser A, Maloney T, Curtin K, Newman M Public Health. 2025; 240:154-160.

PMID: 39908603 PMC: 11884996. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.019.


How much missing data is too much to impute for longitudinal health indicators? A preliminary guideline for the choice of the extent of missing proportion to impute with multiple imputation by chained equations.

Junaid K, Kiran T, Gupta M, Kishore K, Siwatch S Popul Health Metr. 2025; 23(1):2.

PMID: 39893454 PMC: 11787761. DOI: 10.1186/s12963-025-00364-2.


The influence of factors related to public health campaigns on vaccination behavior among population of Wuxi region, China.

Ye Y, Su A Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1498296.

PMID: 39866353 PMC: 11757142. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1498296.


Incorporating area-level social drivers of health in predictive algorithms using electronic health record data.

Foryciarz A, Gladish N, Rehkopf D, Rose S J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025; 32(3):595-601.

PMID: 39832294 PMC: 11833466. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf009.


Trends in the levels, causes, and risk factors of maternal mortality in Pakistan: A comparative analysis of national surveys of 2007 and 2019.

Midhet F, Khalid S, Baqai S, Khan S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0311730.

PMID: 39804883 PMC: 11729956. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311730.


References
1.
Diez Roux A . Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(11):1783-9. PMC: 1446876. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1783. View

2.
Hastert T, Beresford S, Sheppard L, White E . Disparities in cancer incidence and mortality by area-level socioeconomic status: a multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014; 69(2):168-76. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204417. View

3.
Lovasi G, Vernez Moudon A, Smith N, Lumley T, Larson E, Sohn D . Evaluating options for measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic context: evidence from a myocardial infarction case-control study. Health Place. 2007; 14(3):453-67. PMC: 2442019. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.09.004. View

4.
Gomes F, Vasconcellos M, Anjos L . The use of income information of census enumeration area as a proxy for the household income in a household survey. Popul Health Metr. 2009; 7:14. PMC: 2760501. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-14. View

5.
Anderson R, Sorlie P, Backlund E, Johnson N, Kaplan G . Mortality effects of community socioeconomic status. Epidemiology. 1997; 8(1):42-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00007. View