Essential Amino Acid-enriched Whey Enhances Post-exercise Whole-body Protein Balance During Energy Deficit More Than Iso-nitrogenous Whey or a Mixed-macronutrient Meal: a Randomized, Crossover Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The effects of ingesting varying essential amino acid (EAA)/protein-containing food formats on protein kinetics during energy deficit are undetermined. Therefore, recommendations for EAA/protein food formats necessary to optimize both whole-body protein balance and muscle protein synthesis (MPS) during energy deficit are unknown. We measured protein kinetics after consuming iso-nitrogenous amounts of free-form essential amino acid-enriched whey (EAA + W; 34.7 g protein, 24 g EAA sourced from whey and free-form EAA), whey (WHEY; 34.7 g protein, 18.7 g EAA), or a mixed-macronutrient meal (MEAL; 34.7 g protein, 11.4 g EAA) after exercise during short-term energy deficit.
Methods: Ten adults (mean ± SD; 21 ± 4 y; 25.7 ± 1.7 kg/m) completed a randomized, double-blind crossover study consisting of three, 5 d energy-deficit periods (- 30 ± 3% of total energy requirements), separated by 14 d. Whole-body protein synthesis (PS), breakdown (PB), and net balance (NET) were determined at rest and in response to combination exercise consisting of load carriage treadmill walking, deadlifts, and box step-ups at the end of each energy deficit using L-[H]-phenylalanine and L-[H]-tyrosine infusions. Treatments were ingested immediately post-exercise. Mixed-muscle protein synthesis (mixed-MPS) was measured during exercise through recovery.
Results: Change (Δ postabsorptive + exercise to postprandial + recovery [mean treatment difference (95%CI)]) in whole-body (g/180 min) PS was 15.8 (9.8, 21.9; P = 0.001) and 19.4 (14.8, 24.0; P = 0.001) greater for EAA + W than WHEY and MEAL, respectively, with no difference between WHEY and MEAL. ΔPB was - 6.3 (- 11.5, - 1.18; P = 0.02) greater for EAA + W than WHEY and - 7.7 (- 11.9, - 3.6; P = 0.002) greater for MEAL than WHEY, with no difference between EAA + W and MEAL. ΔNET was 22.1 (20.5, 23.8; P = 0.001) and 18.0 (16.5, 19.5; P = 0.00) greater for EAA + W than WHEY and MEAL, respectively, while ΔNET was 4.2 (2.7, 5.6; P = 0.001) greater for MEAL than WHEY. Mixed-MPS did not differ between treatments.
Conclusions: While mixed-MPS was similar across treatments, combining free-form EAA with whey promotes greater whole-body net protein balance during energy deficit compared to iso-nitrogenous amounts of whey or a mixed-macronutrient meal.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier no. NCT04004715 . Retrospectively registered 28 June 2019, first enrollment 6 June 2019.
Arentson-Lantz E, Von Ruff Z, Connolly G, Albano F, Kilroe S, Wacher A J Nutr. 2024; 154(12):3626-3638.
PMID: 39396760 PMC: 11662242. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.010.
Advances in nutritional metabolic therapy to impede the progression of critical illness.
Chen W, Song J, Gong S Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1416910.
PMID: 39036495 PMC: 11259093. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1416910.
Trommelen J, van Loon L Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1391750.
PMID: 38812936 PMC: 11133538. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1391750.
Monteyne A, West S, Stephens F, Wall B Am J Clin Nutr. 2024; 120(1):7-16.
PMID: 38705358 PMC: 11251220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.032.
Antonio J, Evans C, Ferrando A, Stout J, Antonio B, Cinteo H J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2024; 21(1):2341903.
PMID: 38626029 PMC: 11022925. DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2341903.