» Articles » PMID: 33413296

Assessment of Implant Surface and Instrument Insert Changes Due to Instrumentation with Different Tips for Ultrasonic-driven Debridement

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33413296
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To assess the changes of implant surfaces of different roughness after instrumentation with ultrasonic-driven scaler tips of different materials.

Methods: Experiments were performed on two moderately rough surfaces (I-Inicell® and II-SLA®), one surface without pre-treatment (III) and one smooth machined surface (IV). Scaler tips made of steel (A), PEEK (B), titanium (C), carbon (D) and resin (E) were used for instrumentation with a standardized pressure of 100 g for ten seconds and under continuous automatic motion. Each combination of scaler tip and implant surface was performed three times on 8 titanium discs. After instrumentation roughness was assessed by profilometry, morphological changes were assessed by scanning electron microscopy, and element distribution on the utmost surface by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.

Results: The surface roughness of discs I and II were significantly reduced by instrumentation with all tips except E. For disc III and IV roughness was enhanced by tip A and C and, only for IV, by tip D. Instrumentation with tips B, D and E left extensive residuals on surface I, II and III. The element analysis of these deposits proved consistent with the elemental composition of the respective tip materials.

Conclusion: All ultrasonic instruments led to microscopic alterations of all types of implants surfaces assessed in the present study. The least change of implant surfaces might result from resin or carbon tips on machined surfaces.

Citing Articles

Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on the Surface Modification and Cell Adhesion on Titanium Discs: An In Vitro Study.

Shiba T, Ho K, Ma X, Cho Y, Chen C, Kim D Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(19).

PMID: 39410470 PMC: 11477719. DOI: 10.3390/ma17194899.


In-vitro effects of novel periodontal scalers with a planar ultrasonic piezoelectric transducer on periodontal biofilm removal, dentine surface roughness, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts adhesion.

Berto L, Ettmayer J, Stutzer D, Nietzsche S, Niederhauser T, Burger J Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(5):294.

PMID: 38698252 PMC: 11065928. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05671-w.


Effects on the Titanium Implant Surface by Different Hygiene Instrumentations: A Narrative Review.

Yen Nee W, Raja Awang R, Hassan A Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30884.

PMID: 36465763 PMC: 9708459. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30884.


In vitro effect of different implant decontamination methods in three intraosseous defect configurations.

Luengo F, Sanz-Esporrin J, Noguerol F, Sanz-Martin I, Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz M Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33(11):1087-1097.

PMID: 35997508 PMC: 9825956. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13991.

References
1.
Schwartz Z, Boyan B . Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem. 1994; 56(3):340-7. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240560310. View

2.
Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C . Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:6285620. PMC: 4958483. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6285620. View

3.
Fox S, MORIARTY J, Kusy R . The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 1990; 61(8):485-90. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.485. View

4.
Perez-Chaparro P, Duarte P, Shibli J, Montenegro S, Heluy S, Figueiredo L . The Current Weight of Evidence of the Microbiologic Profile Associated With Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2016; 87(11):1295-1304. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.160184. View

5.
Drisko C, Cochran D, Blieden T, Bouwsma O, Cohen R, Damoulis P . Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(11):1792-801. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1792. View